Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #61402
From: Charlie England <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Rotary Engine & Fuel Valves
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:54:52 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
On 10/31/2014 8:09 AM, Ernest Christley wrote:



On Friday, October 31, 2014 12:57 AM, Charlie England <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:

>But...Didn't you mention 6psi fuel pressure? If that's correct, then why have a return line at all? If it's a carb engine,
>just use Facet 'solid state' (interrupter style) pumps. No return line needed.

Good point, Charlie, but the engine came with one of those AeroVee carbs on it.  It's basically a throttle body with a drip feed for fuel.  It gets upset with more that 2psi of pressure, and there are very few regulators that are accurate down that low.  They're basically designed to be gravity fed, and the 601XL doesn't have a header tank.

I'm now seriously considering the transfer pump configuration.  Now that I've been reminded, I remember that Tracy has been flying with that setup for years.  I've got to think about it more.


But what can you use for a bypass style regulator that's accurate at 2 psi, anyway?

Facet makes cube ('solid state') pumps rated as low as 2.0 psi max. Here's a list; the window scrolls for more models.

http://www.facet-purolator.com/cube-fuel-pumps.php

That page mentions 'optional check valve' (CV) but doesn't explain the PSO column. That's basically a 'positive shutoff' or anti-siphon that prevents fuel from flowing through the pump if it's not running. Whether you want that depends on how you plumb the installation. 2 in parallel, you could potentially eliminate valves. 2 in series, twice the pressure but no flow unless both are running. The .pdf link in the page has a better description.

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster