X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "Steven W. Boese" Received: from [157.56.111.118] (HELO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.10) with ESMTPS id 7242584 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:52:19 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=157.56.111.118; envelope-from=SBoese@uwyo.edu Received: from BL2PR05MB098.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.232.15) by BL2PR05MB099.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.232.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:51:30 +0000 Received: from BL2PR05MB098.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.2.178]) by BL2PR05MB098.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.2.178]) with mapi id 15.01.0006.000; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:51:30 +0000 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: SS braided fuel lines Thread-Topic: SS braided fuel lines Thread-Index: AQHP85A0jszOEm8Tvk27OgtPSxI0YA== Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:51:30 +0000 Message-ID: <6E8AAE2E-1559-411D-B8D4-886E1DC69ACF@uwyo.edu> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [69.146.103.188] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2PR05MB099; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 03793408BA x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(189002)(99286002)(77096002)(88552001)(85306004)(95666004)(31966008)(106356001)(229853001)(105586002)(107886001)(46102003)(107046002)(106116001)(80022003)(75432002)(76176999)(76482002)(36756003)(99396003)(120916001)(54356999)(20776003)(66066001)(64706001)(90282001)(82746002)(89122001)(50986999)(4396001)(101416001)(97736003)(86362001)(40100003)(92726001)(110136001)(83716003)(21056001)(33656002)(2656002)(92566001)(87936001)(122556002)(85852003)(104396001)(80792004);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BL2PR05MB099;H:BL2PR05MB098.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uwyo.edu There has been a good discussion of the relative merits of rubber fuel line= s vs rubber lines covered by a SS braid with the SS braid possibly consider= ed overkill with respect to pressure, stiff, heavy, and expensive. There m= ay be some value in considering Teflon lined SS braided lines due to the ch= emical compatibility with nearly everything, high temperature stability, an= d long lifetime. They are still heavy, even stiffer than the rubber SS ver= sion, and expensive. They are certainly more than adequate since they are = often used as brake lines with pressure response comparable to steel tubing= (very little volume change with increasing pressure). My system evolved into a system with the fuel pressure regulator located ne= ar the fuel pumps and outside of the engine compartment. The leak prone fu= el pulsation damper on the fuel rail was also eliminated. The single fuel = line to the fuel injectors (there is no fuel return line in the engine comp= artment) consists of aluminum tubing to the firewall, SS braided Teflon lin= e to the water pump area of the engine, and steel lines to the fuel rails. = There was essentially no elasticity in that system which dead ended at the= fuel injectors. I didn't like the probability of high pressure spikes whe= n all the injectors close simultaneously at substantial fuel flow rates. S= o I installed a 2 ft length of firesleeved rubber fuel injection line at th= e end of the fuel rails as a shock absorber. So now my system has the disa= dvantages of both the rubber and the SS braided lines. Steve Boese RV6A, 1986 13B NA, EC2, RD1A=