X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "Charlie England" Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.10) with ESMTPS id 7229198 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:46:41 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.192.179; envelope-from=ceengland7@gmail.com Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r10so2310183pdi.24 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=8k2TG0aJTrBSFhxAIvw8k7fDVmJBgEENM6e66A2XSv0=; b=ocmjWFW/jbeGYYTlmuw1Qjv5mbo1UU/jTnGR8U/k13z5U7rnfIrUItyifCLpXXZIPe I+BUN2eZx76q3JJbAfmPw+WxVe70iiudius6fpVeimkYio85kPyjagfgiA6oXjwtATCL bR28EB70PEsg8iFmRVWCCyH2kP5/ujaH7Hkh2s1excs3EUKysTV7QzeQGDljvZNVxnAx UPDh1Sw9VpZScDFmaUeinSJORDsuGeou7326reQY9mY3FWeT4UDO1Izmngq4/s0plnPS U5fOrGLZMxxfjVR/R0y536mStiSxn0MtPUHuQLODu8rYz+2frGouzqII3wblWpr6LGeG mikg== X-Received: by 10.68.167.99 with SMTP id zn3mr38460457pbb.30.1413935168567; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2602:306:25fb:99:2cb0:2e01:346:4921? ([2602:306:25fb:99:2cb0:2e01:346:4921]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ml5sm482148pab.32.2014.10.21.16.46.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5446F0B3.6010907@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:48:03 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: GRT EIS and Mazda sensors? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030409080309020804010905" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030409080309020804010905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Aww, shucks. Thanks for the info, Charlie On 10/21/2014 6:35 PM, Tracy wrote: > I used to use a GRT EIS and that was the case with mine too. I > thought the chances of it working with the stock sensors was so small > that I never tried them. > > Tracy > > Sent from my iPad > > On Oct 21, 2014, at 19:03, William Schertz > > wrote: > >> Grand rapids supplied the sensors, in particular, they said the oil >> sender was calibrated for the unit. >> Bill >> *From:* Charlie England >> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 21, 2014 3:19 PM >> *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft >> *Subject:* [FlyRotary] GRT EIS and Mazda sensors? >> For those flying with GRT EIS engine monitors: >> Were you able to use the stock Mazda water & oil temp sensors? >> Thanks, >> Charlie --------------030409080309020804010905 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Aww, shucks.

Thanks for the info,

Charlie

On 10/21/2014 6:35 PM, Tracy wrote:
I used to use a GRT EIS and that was the case with mine too.  I thought the chances of it working with the stock sensors was so small that I never tried them.

Tracy

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 21, 2014, at 19:03, William Schertz <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:

Grand rapids supplied the sensors, in particular, they said the oil sender was calibrated for the unit.
Bill
 
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 3:19 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] GRT EIS and Mazda sensors?
 
For those flying with GRT EIS engine monitors: 
 
Were you able to use the stock Mazda water & oil temp sensors?
 
Thanks,
 
Charlie

--------------030409080309020804010905--