Return-Path: <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 3053481 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:25:35 -0500
Received: from edward (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20])
	by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i221PVkG021828
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:25:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <002501c3fff5$418c9af0$2402a8c0@edward>
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-3053258@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Why does it take so long - improved cooling
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:25:32 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine


, NC
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neil Kruiswyk" <neilak@rogers.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 5:22 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Why does it take so long - improved cooling


>
>
> Unlike the rest of us!!??
>
>
> BTW...  Nice job on the manifold.  I'd like to here your findings on the
> optimal length.
>
> Neil
> Thanks, Neil

    Should have it up and running this week.  Wanted to get it done before
all the cold weather disappear so I could see the full affect of
temperature, but the cold weather seems to be going, going, gone.  A nice
35F morning will do - even if just one.  I will certainly let everyone know
the results - good, bad or ugly.

Ed