X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-gg0-f171.google.com ([209.85.161.171] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6003616 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:42:54 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.161.171; envelope-from=ceengland7@gmail.com Received: by mail-gg0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 4so441828ggm.30 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:42:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=YSg8ussGxFTzFiosur6z9QjwyDlFtggKxRAHAFg2JoY=; b=yRfO/LqckfmEgF0UefJNO3/KJR3oObnTiem9fTsG+CATYfB4ezcXAEDMseCWc72FXC wRJbF+X+gmPFWNyuGzqV0GmSIU+h74TTxOw4REy5i9KpllkXVMY+fKJdDN6pkLDBr/aa cPHJHKjl+UlbnZKXRlTix06My6PKYj++/2NtvXfFGIImUeTAjX44OMmS74bElocRiFUQ YSLAbN4cbLjaVi3yErRxcFxgKD0scHLMnUemDH/WMIuF0yBmsa7ELuQdDZ40PtJPQam3 P3OqQAmVz94fySClr2BHssD2c9eSJWjmp1l8M5dfcev1orOF6AcVDmj+h1LN2nBULYNn af7A== X-Received: by 10.236.128.73 with SMTP id e49mr78905818yhi.53.1357767742235; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:42:22 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.10.21] (adsl-98-95-178-185.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.178.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d66sm75674692yhe.1.2013.01.09.13.42.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:42:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50EDE43B.9030007@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:42:19 -0600 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel pressure References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070903070105000606050403" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070903070105000606050403 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The link says 'boost/vacuum reference port: yes'. On 01/09/2013 03:37 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote: > > The regulator is Aeromotive... > > http://www.summitracing.com/parts/aei-13109/overview/ > > b2 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] > *On Behalf Of *Bobby J. Hughes > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 09, 2013 3:42 PM > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: fuel pressure > > Bill > > If it's a 1-1 regulator it should. > > Bobby > > *From:*Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] > *On Behalf Of *Bill Bradburry > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 09, 2013 2:33 PM > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] fuel pressure > > I have been considering going with a turbo and I got to thinking. > (always dangerous). > > I set my fuel pressure regulator with the engine off and at ambient > atmos pressure (55 ft so pretty close to sea level), then the > regulator reduces the pressure when the engine is running at a lower > manifold pressure than ambient. > > My question to those who know is if I boosted the engine to say 38-40 > inches, will the regulator increase the fuel pressure accordingly? > The regulator is Aeroquipt. > > B2 > --------------070903070105000606050403 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The link says 'boost/vacuum reference port: yes'.

On 01/09/2013 03:37 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:

The regulator is Aeromotive…

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/aei-13109/overview/

b2

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bobby J. Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 3:42 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel pressure

Bill

If it’s a 1-1 regulator it should.

Bobby

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Bradburry
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 2:33 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] fuel pressure

I have been considering going with a turbo and I got to thinking. (always dangerous).

I set my fuel pressure regulator with the engine off and at ambient atmos pressure (55 ft so pretty close to sea level), then the regulator reduces the pressure when the engine is running at a lower manifold pressure than ambient.

My question to those who know is if I boosted the engine to say 38-40 inches, will the regulator increase the fuel pressure accordingly? The regulator is Aeroquipt.

B2

--------------070903070105000606050403--