X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost05.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.105] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 6003620 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:38:25 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.105; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net Received: from desktop (adsl-98-85-145-180.mco.bellsouth.net[98.85.145.180]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc05) with SMTP id <20130109213750H05008qeehe>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:37:50 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [98.85.145.180] From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel pressure Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:37:52 -0500 Message-ID: <86BC7351D61E496A83B02401AB024443@Desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01CDEE87.AB85F110" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac3uqdXzkdkonQ6LQICwb2w4GY7LWAAB5wQg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CDEE87.AB85F110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The regulator is Aeromotive. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/aei-13109/overview/ b2 _____ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bobby J. Hughes Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 3:42 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel pressure Bill If it's a 1-1 regulator it should. Bobby From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Bradburry Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 2:33 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] fuel pressure I have been considering going with a turbo and I got to thinking. (always dangerous). I set my fuel pressure regulator with the engine off and at ambient atmos pressure (55 ft so pretty close to sea level), then the regulator reduces the pressure when the engine is running at a lower manifold pressure than ambient. My question to those who know is if I boosted the engine to say 38-40 inches, will the regulator increase the fuel pressure accordingly? The regulator is Aeroquipt. B2 ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CDEE87.AB85F110 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The regulator is = Aeromotive…

http://www= .summitracing.com/parts/aei-13109/overview/<= /p>

b2

From: = Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bobby J. Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, January = 09, 2013 3:42 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = fuel pressure

Bill

<= /o:p>

If = it’s a 1-1 regulator it should.

<= /o:p>

Bobby

<= /o:p>

From: = Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Bradburry
Sent: Wednesday, January = 09, 2013 2:33 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] fuel = pressure

I have been considering going with a turbo and I got = to thinking. (always dangerous).

I set my fuel pressure regulator with the engine off = and at ambient atmos pressure (55 ft so pretty close to sea level), then the = regulator reduces the pressure when the engine is running at a lower manifold = pressure than ambient.

My question to those who know is if I boosted the = engine to say 38-40 inches, will the regulator increase the fuel pressure accordingly? The regulator is = Aeroquipt.

B2

------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CDEE87.AB85F110--