X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com ([209.85.220.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c2) with ESMTPS id 5901722 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:00:29 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.180; envelope-from=msteitle@gmail.com Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id fk26so5137693vcb.25 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:59:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MU8P45zewD0IEx3rNmSoYWj7MKRzVyFBwleJMuiJnac=; b=bZLVOjrcPM+DVcCKG2y6lYT70p7Cz+0DXI1LhyrdBzQT5a7fciQ4/bsy7KvNMxiWUl jtYp50ET7K1uw3w4gLaeBhGvlKJ2JV83oAK8IAJ6Tw6emW8ATw6sGmnWVS0Yxdt8d9Wo k4Z+QradoLKUKQDMXE9Rlcm3+RkX5rIhwaryefAofluc7QnX3QMY6fJaYGHKC5Hx5LQP a+npYYVzbeL8DAookz9sGKmyO08xXGuwuXySI8Hn8JHEqYHSMbwmZIOa8yHYVigE3VSA +Ukpxhz/2DbEv+Ku7md9geypPKgRjl97Gh7KPqGZvX/grDpAbMGxdVF6Lsk03ezAk1tg qGXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.157.68 with SMTP id a4mr8757192vcx.60.1353729595386; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.49.71 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:59:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:59:55 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Defined Autoworks parts site / Mark's 20B From: Mark Steitle To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7ea8a7acc404cf35bb06 --f46d043c7ea8a7acc404cf35bb06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sounds about right, maybe a bit more hp than I'm making, but I haven't dyno'd my motor so that's just a guess. Intake and exhaust have a big effect on power. If my exhaust runners were equal length and tuned, my motor would probably be within a few hp of those numbers. But since I don't have room under the cowl for long pipes, I'll have to live with what I get. What I can say is that I picked up 20+ knots on the top end over the original side-port 20b motor. Mark On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:43 PM, wrote: > ** > Interesting dyno printouts! How does your P-Port compare to the their 20B > numbers Mark? The one screen showed them producing about 320 hp at 7,000 > rpm... > > Doug > > --f46d043c7ea8a7acc404cf35bb06 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sounds about right, maybe a bit more hp than I'm making, but I haven= 9;t dyno'd my motor so that's just a guess. =A0Intake and exhaust h= ave a big effect on power. =A0If my exhaust runners were equal length and t= uned, my motor would probably be within a few hp of those numbers. =A0But s= ince I don't have room under the cowl for long pipes, I'll have to = live with what I get. =A0What I can say is that I picked up 20+ knots on th= e top end over the original side-port 20b motor.=A0

Mark=A0

On Fri, Nov 23, 20= 12 at 7:43 PM, <DLOMHEIM@aol.com> wrote:
Interesting dyno printouts!=A0 How does your P-Port compare to the the= ir=20 20B numbers Mark?=A0 The one screen showed them producing about 320 hp at= =20 7,000 rpm...
=A0
Doug
=A0

--f46d043c7ea8a7acc404cf35bb06--