X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from zixvpm1.fdic.gov ([167.176.6.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c1) with ESMTPS id 5721849 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:25:39 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=167.176.6.41; envelope-from=brogers@fdic.gov Received: from zixvpm1.fdic.gov (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1]) by Outbound.fdic.gov (Proprietary) with ESMTP id D852F940734 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:25:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail3.fdic.gov (unknown [10.30.1.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zixvpm1.fdic.gov (Proprietary) with ESMTP id 6607D940723 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:25:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail3.fdic.gov (vasdlp [10.30.1.14]) by mail3.fdic.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q7LEP0hV009204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:25:01 -0400 From: "Rogers, Bob J." To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo question. Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo question. Thread-Index: AQHNf0CZd3le14dc+U+8EV52ucIIRpdkUAKQ Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:24:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.25.246.150] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Chris, I fly with a Mazda 13B turbo in my Mustang II. On take-off, I regularly pu= ll more than 40 inches of MP. Three pounds of boost equals approximately 6= inches of manifold pressure, so you should be getting approximately 36 inc= hes of MP if the field atmospheric pressure is approximately 30 inches. Ho= uston is close to sea level. It sounds like you have a severe airflow restriction somewhere in your turb= o system, because you most certainly should be getting more MP at full thro= ttle than described below. Further evidence of this is the fact that MP go= es up when you disconnect the turbo. If you have an intercooler, is it blo= cking the airflow? Maybe clogged up? Bob -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Beh= alf Of Chris Barber Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 8:58 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo question. I am taking the MP reading from the intake before the injectors but after t= he turbo, pop off valve and intercooler, in that order. I only have a 3 lb = spring in the wastegate currently to control boost. Since I had a detonatio= n issue a while back requiring a teardown to replace apex seals, likely due= to too low of octane fuel, I wanted to start with just a little boost at f= irst.=20 Sent from my iPhone 4 On Aug 20, 2012, at 8:42 PM, "Ed Anderson" wrot= e: > Chris, >=20 > Exactly where are you taking your manifold pressure from- >=20 > I presume it is after the turbocharger compressor - somewhere between th= e turbo and the intake manifold OR at the manifold. >=20 > The only way I can make sense of your reading based on information provid= ed thus far is that you are taking your manifold pressure reading before th= e turbocharger compressor inlet. Then the increased airflow caused by the = turbocharger could cause the pressure drop before the compressor due to fil= ter or other restriction. >=20 > Even if you have a restrictive filter, the pressure on the compressor out= let side of the turbo, the turbocharger on pressure in your manifold should= be higher than without the turbo. >=20 > You are not spinning your turbo backwards are you?{:>) >=20 > Ed > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Chris Barber" > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 9:17 PM > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Turbo question. >=20 >> As I have mentioned I have had what I think are incongruent readings reg= arding my manifold pressure (mp)and engine rpm. It seems I am getting quite= low mp as I add power to higher rpm. >>=20 >> I am not well versed in this area but my thought is that as I add power,= even with slight boost (currently using a 3 lb spring in my wastegate) eve= ntually my mp should raise a bit more. >>=20 >> Today I did some static test. I recorded engine RPM with the turbo hook= ed up and recorded the mp at 1000 rpm increments. Then I removed the turbo = plumbing from my intake and recorded the same info My results currently con= fuse me. >>=20 >> With the turbo hooked up I am getting >>=20 >> RPM. MP inches >> 2000 - 14.0 >> 3000 - 15.5 >> 4000 - 19.3 >> 5000 - 21.6 >> 5700 - 24.5 (topped out) >>=20 >> With the turbo removed. >>=20 >> 2000 - 15.8 >> 3000 - 15.3 >> 4000 - 19.7 >> 5000 - 24.8 >> 5833 - 29.8 >>=20 >> Is this indicative of restriction in my plumbing? Perhaps in the inter c= ooler? A dirty air filter? A bad pop off valve or a leak not allowing the a= ir pressure getting to the intake. Or???? >>=20 >> I am uncertain what other permitters I need to check and provide. I am j= ust starting my diagnosis in my Phase One testing. I only have 1.6 hours in= the air so far. I value ya'll's direction and input. >>=20 >> Heck, perhaps this is working properly but it just doesn't seem right/co= mfortable. >>=20 >> Thanks folks. >>=20 >> Chris Barber >> Houston >> Velocity SE >> Rotary 13b turbo (?) :-) >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone 4 >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List= .html >>=20 >>=20 >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5211 - Release Date: 08/20/1= 2 >>=20 >=20 > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/Lis= t.html -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.= html