X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-mb01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c1) with ESMTP id 5703275 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:55:26 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.207.164; envelope-from=CozyGirrrl@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.138]) by imr-mb01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q7AJshR4009395 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:54:43 -0400 Received: from core-dsc004b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dsc004.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.253.77]) by mtaomg-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 43365E000087 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:54:43 -0400 (EDT) From: CozyGirrrl@aol.com Message-ID: <1dc6b.28ef09aa.3d56c103@aol.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:54:43 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust flanges To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1dc6b.28ef09aa.3d56c103_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 5004 X-Originating-IP: [99.175.101.35] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1344628483; bh=BCColdPglu8s9W8CGRM47nBgOls4sHKlrjsAXasuXAY=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Oo8E9jZW2h//3dgJPAfazxu8QRR/Z5y3UCz8TjM9c665D/IBVoIS3PMIySGFGIfat EobZ5KybS5HbNn2leuvONxVQppeTbUL3a5Tq1PxFlzAScfDHk0JBjPIh8YGsJ1hFC4 3OJkR79d9vvetAfR/rMqI77szkiFqNkyKPwUxY/g= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:467059008:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338a502567033dc6 --part1_1dc6b.28ef09aa.3d56c103_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks guys that will be helpful, we will go with two separate ones. We are in HMB California right now =) ...and loving it! Chrissi & Randi In a message dated 8/8/2012 8:54:50 A.M. Central Daylight Time, echristley@att.net writes: CozyGirrrl@aol.com wrote: > We're curious about 13B turbo exhaust flanges, is there any reason they > need to be one flange for both pipes or do you think it will seal up > fine with one per? > We're looking for small weight savings as well as easier to build up > each pipe. The other ends of the pipes are floating with a double flange > going into a collector. > > Chrissi & Randi > I'm doing one per. On one side, the runner is welded to the collector. The other side uses a muffler clamp. At some point before I fly I'm going to have to pull the engine to fix a slow oil leak at the front housing. I will pull the muffler at that time to inspect the flanges for leaks. -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html --part1_1dc6b.28ef09aa.3d56c103_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks guys that will be helpful, we will go with two separate ones. <= /DIV>
We are in HMB California right now =3D) 
...and loving it!
 
Chrissi &=20 Randi
 
In a message dated 8/8/2012 8:54:50 A.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 echristley@att.net writes:
= CozyGirrrl@aol.com wrote:
> We're curious about 13B turbo = exhaust=20 flanges, is there any reason they
> need to be one flange for both = pipes=20 or do you think it will seal up
> fine with one per?
> We're= =20 looking for small weight savings as well as easier to build up
> ea= ch=20 pipe. The other ends of the pipes are floating with a double flange
&g= t;=20 going into a collector.

> Chrissi & Randi
>= ;=20

I'm doing one per.  On one side, the runner is welded to the= =20 collector.  The other side uses a muffler clamp.  At some
po= int=20 before I fly I'm going to have to pull the engine to fix a slow oil leak = at=20 the front housing.  I will pull the
muffler at that time to inspe= ct=20 the flanges for leaks.

--
Homepage: =20 http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:  =20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
--part1_1dc6b.28ef09aa.3d56c103_boundary--