X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [137.118.16.51] (HELO smtp1.av-mx.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.6) with ESMTP id 5644090 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:37:10 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=137.118.16.51; envelope-from=res12@fairpoint.net Received: from MAIN (unknown [66.243.228.156]) (Authenticated sender: res12@fairpoint.net) by smtp1.av-mx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140F8291FFC for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:36:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: From: "Richard Sohn" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: First lift off with single rotor Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:36:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 -----Original Message----- From: Ernest Christley Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 11:12 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: First lift off with single rotor Richard Sohn wrote: > Cleared the ground for a brief period today. As far as the airplane is > concerned, everything is good. CG seems to be right on the spot. Much > better as it was 12 years ago at the first flight with the SOOB. > Here is the reason why it was not a flight. A few days ago when I > started high speed taxi, as soon as it picked up air speed, the engine > started to sputter and almost cut out totally. This was at the same RPM > as at a run up, where it does not do that. With a wiggly tail dragger as > the Avid is, there was no way reading enough instrument for making a > preliminary analysis. I recorded the instrument panel with a GoPro at > 2sec intervals. > Looking at the first pictures, the answer came up right away, increasing > pressure under the cowl where the intake for the engine is located. Like > the EGT shot up over 1600 just before the sputtering started. Since my > radiator air is going to the outside of the cowling, there was no impact > on cooling. Btw cooling is really good. At an OAT of 95F, oil and water > stayed at around 170F no matter what I did. > > For todays runs, I taped the inlet around the prop hub shut. Sure > enough, the sputtering occurred at higher airspeed, and was not as > total, however, EGT was still going to around 1600. > > The conclusion is, I have to open the cowling exits a lot. I don't get it. The pressure under the cowl sounds like it would be a good thing, because it sounds like it is enough to cause the engine to lean out. If the cooling isn't a problem, why wouldn't you just enrichen the mixture to accommodate the extra air and accept the increase in power? Ernest, I am not using electronic fuel injection. My fuel system operates pretty much like a carb with mixture control. In addition, I would not want to have to adjust the mixture when changing the air speed. Your comment certainly reflects one advantage of EFI. Richard Sohn N2071U http://www.fairpoint.net/~res12/home.html -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html