X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.6) with ESMTPS id 5644062 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:13:51 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.240.18.37; envelope-from=echristley@att.net X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,552,1336374000"; d="scan'208";a="660875237" Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2012 09:12:45 -0700 Received: from [10.62.19.17] (ernestc-laptop.hq.netapp.com [10.62.19.17]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q69GCiK7023588 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FFB02FB.1030201@att.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:12:43 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@att.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] First lift off with single rotor References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Richard Sohn wrote: > Cleared the ground for a brief period today. As far as the airplane is > concerned, everything is good. CG seems to be right on the spot. Much > better as it was 12 years ago at the first flight with the SOOB. > Here is the reason why it was not a flight. A few days ago when I > started high speed taxi, as soon as it picked up air speed, the engine > started to sputter and almost cut out totally. This was at the same RPM > as at a run up, where it does not do that. With a wiggly tail dragger as > the Avid is, there was no way reading enough instrument for making a > preliminary analysis. I recorded the instrument panel with a GoPro at > 2sec intervals. > Looking at the first pictures, the answer came up right away, increasing > pressure under the cowl where the intake for the engine is located. Like > the EGT shot up over 1600 just before the sputtering started. Since my > radiator air is going to the outside of the cowling, there was no impact > on cooling. Btw cooling is really good. At an OAT of 95F, oil and water > stayed at around 170F no matter what I did. > > For todays runs, I taped the inlet around the prop hub shut. Sure > enough, the sputtering occurred at higher airspeed, and was not as > total, however, EGT was still going to around 1600. > > The conclusion is, I have to open the cowling exits a lot. I don't get it. The pressure under the cowl sounds like it would be a good thing, because it sounds like it is enough to cause the engine to lean out. If the cooling isn't a problem, why wouldn't you just enrichen the mixture to accommodate the extra air and accept the increase in power?