Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.236.23; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net
Message-ID: <4EE6C747.1090005@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:32:23 -0600
From: Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: RV7 for sale...
References: <list-5302095@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-5302095@logan.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------030106030805090002050603"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030106030805090002050603
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 12/12/2011 06:57 PM, Ben Schneider wrote:
> Guys,
>
>    I do like the Bearhawk, and my wife would love for me to build an 
> airplane with that kind of capacity, however, In agreement with what 
> several of you mentioned, the runway needs of the aircraft are not 
> drastically different than a well powered RV7.  I am actually looking 
> towards a Mackey SQ2 (for those unfamiliar, think Super-Duper Cub) or 
> the Just Highlander, though not as large as I'd like, the price is a 
> big seller. Both have TO-Landing in the sub 200' range. With either, I 
> can use my yard as is, and they will fit in my shed too. No hanger 
> rent, no runway to buy, no hanger rent, no drive to the airport to 
> play, no hanger rent.
>
> But don't give up on me just yet. I still plan to finish my 7. Though, 
> I see a fellow is interested in my engine and accessories. That helps. 
> I am pretty sure I could sell the airframe, the market is somewhat 
> less flooded with rotary engine buyers.
>
> I appreciate all the all the well wishes, and, as I said in the first 
> post, this group has been a MAJOR contributor in my build, and my 
> certainly my understanding of the engine and systems.
>
> Best,
>
> Ben
>
Oooohh; one of my neighbors apparently knows the SQ2 guys, & one came 
through here a few months ago. You're right; that would work. :-)

Charlie

--------------030106030805090002050603
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <title></title>
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    On 12/12/2011 06:57 PM, Ben Schneider wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:list-5302095@logan.com" type="cite">
      <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td style="font: inherit;" valign="top">Guys,
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>&nbsp; &nbsp;I do like the Bearhawk, and my wife would love for
                me to build an airplane with that kind of capacity,
                however, In agreement with what several of you
                mentioned, the runway needs of the aircraft are not
                drastically different than a well powered RV7. &nbsp;I am
                actually looking towards a Mackey SQ2 (for those
                unfamiliar, think Super-Duper Cub) or the Just
                Highlander, though not as large as I'd like, the price
                is a big seller. Both have TO-Landing in the sub 200'
                range. With either, I can use my yard as is, and they
                will fit in my shed too. No hanger rent, no runway to
                buy, no hanger rent, no drive to the airport to play, no
                hanger rent.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>But don't give up on me just yet. I still plan to
                finish my 7. Though, I see a fellow is interested in my
                engine and accessories. That helps. I am pretty sure I
                could sell the airframe, the market is somewhat less
                flooded with rotary engine buyers.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I appreciate all the all the well wishes, and, as I
                said in the first post, this group has been a MAJOR
                contributor in my build, and my certainly my
                understanding of the engine and systems.&nbsp;</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Best,</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Ben</div>
            </td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </blockquote>
    <font size="+1"><font face="Arial">Oooohh; one of my neighbors
        apparently knows the SQ2 guys, &amp; one came through here a few
        months ago. You're right; that would work. :-)<br>
        <br>
        Charlie<br>
      </font></font>
  </body>
</html>

--------------030106030805090002050603--