X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-da05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.147] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5125986 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:15:35 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.147; envelope-from=CozyGirrrl@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.139]) by imr-da05.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p8FKExQp031387 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:14:59 -0400 Received: from core-dsd003a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dsd003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.253.137]) by mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 15E95E00008E for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:14:58 -0400 (EDT) From: CozyGirrrl@aol.com Message-ID: <1bff9.55111f11.3ba3b6c1@aol.com> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:14:57 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: The good news and the bad news...... To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1bff9.55111f11.3ba3b6c1_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 5004 X-Originating-IP: [70.242.144.65] x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:459468320:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338b4e725cc247fd --part1_1bff9.55111f11.3ba3b6c1_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chad, The CAS's are magnetic, not sure how they would work being that close facing each other? Chrissi & Randi _www.CozyGirrrl.com_ (http://www.cozygirrrl.com/) CG Products, Custom Aircraft Hardware Chairwomen, Sun-N-Fun Engine Workshop In a message dated 9/15/2011 12:45:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time, crobinson@medialantern.com writes: On 9/15/2011 1:21 PM, Tracy wrote: The CAS references the crank, not the rotor. Is that. It? I'm still confused about something myself. Everybody keeps talking about adding another CAS as requiring it to be "in a different position", with an offset. My 3rd-gen CAS sits on a small bracket just behind the toothed wheel on the front shaft. Past that toothed wheel there's a healthy (from memory: 1.5"?) gap from there to the back of the alternator pulley. What's to stop me from making a bracket and putting a second CAS in that gap, facing backward? It would be in exactly the same position as the current CAS, just facing backward. Would they interfere with one another? If so, as an alternative, what about using a second toothed wheel either on top of the first and before the alternator pulley, or if side loads were a concern, on the very end of the shaft past the pulley? --part1_1bff9.55111f11.3ba3b6c1_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chad,
The CAS's are magnetic, not sure how they would work being that close= =20 facing each other?
 
Chrissi &=20 Randi
www.CozyGirrrl.com
C= G=20 Products, Custom Aircraft Hardware
Chairwomen, Sun-N-Fun Engine Workshop=
 
In a message dated 9/15/2011 12:45:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 crobinson@medialantern.com writes:
= On=20 9/15/2011 1:21 PM, Tracy wrote:=20
The=20 CAS references the crank, not the rotor.   Is that.=20 It?
I'm still confused about something myself. Everybody = keeps=20 talking about adding another CAS as requiring it to be "in a different=20 position", with an offset. My 3rd-gen CAS sits on a small bracket just be= hind=20 the toothed wheel on the front shaft. Past that toothed wheel there's a= =20 healthy (from memory: 1.5"?) gap from there to the back of the alternator= =20 pulley.

What's to stop me from making a bracket and putting a seco= nd=20 CAS in that gap, facing backward? It would be in exactly the same positio= n as=20 the current CAS, just facing backward. Would they interfere with one anot= her?=20 If so, as an alternative, what about using a second toothed wheel either = on=20 top of the first and before the alternator pulley, or if side loads were = a=20 concern, on the very end of the shaft past the=20 pulley?

--part1_1bff9.55111f11.3ba3b6c1_boundary--