X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <thomasmann51@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.212.52] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0)
  with ESMTPS id 5040702 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:30:12 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.212.52; envelope-from=thomasmann51@gmail.com
Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so3222738vws.25
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=kIs4UGLeBqVxibwL1KHkgcNyyR3F/hYOdkdv4CelHUs=;
        b=mO+PsAdf9zKVVLQP5JiqKUeTDf2M/qG0Rp9WxV6IbdPbDCh7bbA1NgDWTlXUrPJNlM
         rUHs+6fJo/THKCvYCbjmiB5bxDqEssCw7rLQWAwQnKgCvCJ8ibOCCovcFbKjuiwObhlB
         Fa7Xf513wAIHC/veZzTMw7VvoI2mYvvE/IJvs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.215.8 with SMTP id hc8mr1600488vcb.166.1309638575280; Sat,
 02 Jul 2011 13:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.181.202 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-5040703@logan.com>
References: <list-5040703@logan.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:29:35 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=8bt-Xk+ULBAkYZO=5ZP4r0woZgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 20B Installation
From: Thomas Mann <thomasmann51@gmail.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54ee75210534f04a71bfe68

--bcaec54ee75210534f04a71bfe68
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

No turbo for me.

I was looking at the turbo two rotor and decided (based on weight and
simplicity) to go with the three rotor N/A instead.

I felt that to add the complexity of the turbo took away more than it gave.
What draws me to the rotary in the first place is the simplicity. If I add
the turbo, I've lost this level of simplicity.

T Mann

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Kelly Troyer <keltro@att.net> wrote:

> Thomas,
>      Turbo ??......................
>
>

--bcaec54ee75210534f04a71bfe68
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No turbo for me.<div><br></div><div>I was looking at the turbo two rotor an=
d decided (based on weight and simplicity) to go with the three rotor N/A i=
nstead.=A0</div><div><br></div><div>I felt that to add the complexity of th=
e turbo took away more than it gave. What draws me to the rotary in the fir=
st place is the simplicity. If I add the turbo, I&#39;ve lost this level of=
 simplicity.</div>
<div><br></div><div>T Mann</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul =
2, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Kelly Troyer <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ke=
ltro@att.net">keltro@att.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"=
gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-=
left:1ex;">
<div><div style=3D"color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:arial, helv=
etica, sans-serif;font-size:14pt"><div><span>Thomas,</span></div>
<div><span>=A0=A0=A0=A0 Turbo ??......................<var></var></span></d=
iv><div class=3D"im">
<div></div>
<div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div>

--bcaec54ee75210534f04a71bfe68--