Return-Path: Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2948627 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 22:33:38 -0500 Received: from [68.158.211.19] by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040126033336.VSLA1950.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[68.158.211.19]> for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 22:33:36 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 22:33:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Alternator belt path From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3157914814_15155987" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3157914814_15155987 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit The blades are curved Jim. Bulent On 1/25/04 9:38 PM, "Jim Sower" wrote: > So if you put a 2nd gen pump on a 3d gen engine it pumps backwards? ;-)) I > guess if the impeller blades run straight radially it wouldn't matter. > But if they don't? .... > Jim Sower ... Destiny's Plaything > Crossville, TN; Chapter 5 > Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T > > > Ed Anderson wrote: >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: daveleonard@cox.net >>> To: Rotary motors in aircraft >>> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 4:20 PM >>> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Alternator belt path >>> >>> >>> >>> That is interesting. Please tell me that the rotation for the water pump >>> for the 3rd generation is oppisite that for the second generation. I am >>> using a simple belt scheme (everything turning the same direction). But in >>> your drawing the water pump is turning in the oppisite direction. Yet I >>> don't remember ever discussing that the pump rotation direction was >>> different on the 3rd generation engines. >>> >>> Dave Leonard Dave, The rotation for the water pump on the 3rd generation IS >>> opposite that for a second generation or the first generation for that >>> matter. Given the geometry of the layout and belt angles, it looks like >>> they had to run it off the "back" of the serpentine belt. Ed Anderson > > > --B_3157914814_15155987 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Alternator belt path The blades are curved J= im.
Bulent

On 1/25/04 9:38 PM, "Jim Sower" <canarder@frontiernet.net> = wrote:

So if you put a 2nd gen pump on a 3d gen engine it pumps backwards? ;-)) =  I guess if the impeller blades run straight radially it wouldn't matte= r.
But if they don't? ....
Jim Sower ... Destiny's Plaything
Crossville, TN; Chapter 5
Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T
 

Ed Anderson wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: daveleonard@cox.net
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 4:20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Alternator belt path
 


That is interesting.  Please tell me that the rotation for the water p= ump for the 3rd generation is oppisite that for the second generation. I am = using a simple belt scheme (everything turning the same direction). But in y= our drawing the water pump is turning in the oppisite direction. Yet I don't= remember ever discussing that the pump rotation direction was different on = the 3rd generation engines.

Dave Leonard  Dave, The rotation for the water pump on the 3rd gene= ration IS opposite that for a second generation or the first generation for = that matter.  Given the geometry of the layout and belt angles, it look= s like they had to run it off the "back" of the serpentine belt. E= d Anderson

 
 



 --B_3157914814_15155987--