Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2948306 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:07:11 -0500 Received: from edward (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i0PM77Ys019258 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:07:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <026601c3e38f$9582ed80$2402a8c0@edward> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Alternator belt path Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:07:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0263_01C3E365.AC4D8770" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0263_01C3E365.AC4D8770 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message ----- Original Message -----=20 From: daveleonard@cox.net=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 4:20 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Alternator belt path That is interesting. Please tell me that the rotation for the water = pump for the 3rd generation is oppisite that for the second generation. = I am using a simple belt scheme (everything turning the same direction). = But in your drawing the water pump is turning in the oppisite = direction. Yet I don't remember ever discussing that the pump rotation = direction was different on the 3rd generation engines. Dave Leonard =20 Dave, The rotation for the water pump on the 3rd generation IS = opposite that for a second generation or the first generation for that = matter. Given the geometry of the layout and belt angles, it looks like = they had to run it off the "back" of the serpentine belt.=20 Ed Anderson ------=_NextPart_000_0263_01C3E365.AC4D8770 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 daveleonard@cox.net
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 = 4:20=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Alternator belt=20 path


That is interesting.  Please tell me that the = rotation=20 for the water pump for the 3rd generation is oppisite that for the = second=20 generation.  I am using a simple belt scheme (everything turning = the same=20 direction).  But in your drawing the water pump is turning in the = oppisite direction.  Yet I don't remember ever discussing that = the pump=20 rotation direction was different on the 3rd generation = engines.

Dave=20 Leonard

 
 
Dave, The rotation for the water pump = on the 3rd=20 generation IS opposite that for a second generation or the first = generation=20 for that matter.  Given the geometry of the layout and belt = angles, it=20 looks like they had to run it off the "back" of the serpentine=20 belt. 
 
Ed = Anderson
------=_NextPart_000_0263_01C3E365.AC4D8770--