I am forwarding this to our group,
if it hasn't already been done so. We also need to be concerned about this
situation. I would suggest that anybody with any infleuence may want to
put his 2C into it.
Greg Ward
Lancair Legacy 20b, N178RG, still in
progress
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 10:00 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Beware update
As most of you on the list know we had an incident in April here in St.
Louis where one of our own was "stopped" by local police based on a "tip" from
Customs and Border Patrol. Here is an update to that story:
Bob Rickard (who was the individual stopped) and I have received more
emails from other Lancair pilots who have been stopped as well based on "tips"
from CBP. So this is not an isolated incident. I contacted AOPA, my
congressman's staff, and CBP themselves. AOPA's Craig Spence is presently
working this issue on our behalf. He already had ascheduled meeting with
CBP on Wednesday, so he brought this subject up. He said that CBP wants to be
the new "skycop". He conveyed our concerns to them --targeting GA for
poloce searches and the issue of the fax that is sent to police agencies
justifying detaining pilots. Mr. Spence told them that the fax has errors on it
and agreed to help them correct those. On the issue of tracking GA flights and
detaining pilots, Mr. Spence said the CBP is not budging. He believes we need to
take this to Congressional leaders --he said we are in for a long battle with
CBP.
The day after Mr. Spence's meeting I received two phone calls from CBP (so
it is true about smelly stuff rolling downhill). The first call was from
"Carlos" at CBP HQ. Carlos works in Gen. Mike Kostelnik's office in DC.
Kostelnik, a retired AF two star, is the head of the CBP Air and Marine
Center. Carlos wanted to know what our concerns were and I repeated that we did
not like getting stopped based on bogus information. He wanted to know how I was
certain CBP was behind these stops (he implied they had nothing to do with it)
and I said it was from information from the local police and the fax AMOC sent
to them. (Ah, the truth and evidence is so great) He was pretty agitated
during our conversation and said if we were stopped and the police questioned us
then we should tell them what they wanted to know. I said I disagreed (Fifth
Amendment) . I gave him the specifics of Bobaloos stop two weeks ago and he
agreed to look into it. I said that in the best light their intell is
either unvetted or their analyis is poor. He disagreed (of course) and gave
many other reasons (all bogus) as to why their intel was good. He said it could
have been because the aircraft was a prior drug aircraft. I replied that would
be pretty difficult since I built it, flew it and then sold it to Col. Rickard.
I said that in the worst light --their folks are making up stories to get the
local police to stop GA pilots--for the crime of ....flying. Of course he about
blew a gasket. I asked him to tell me where CBP got this
information about Bob carrying a fugitive. He replied that is a matter of
national security and could not tell me.
A couple of hours later I receive a phone call from Tony C. at the CBP AMOC
in Riverside, CA asking again about my concerns. Again I expressed the same and
while he was very polite and cordial and appears to be a dedicated public
servant doing a tough job I reiterated that law abiding GA pilots do not enjoy
getting stopped by law enforcement based on seemingly bogus information. Tony
said they are just trying to "put their eyes on people"--meaning us. I remarked
that there has to be a better way of doing that than surrounding a pilot
with 6 police cars and ten officers. He said they have tough job catching
bad guys. I said that that they need to do a better job screening their
intel. It seemed both he and Carlos went back and forth on whether the intel
came from internal sources or external ones. At one point he said people were
calling their hotline with tips -- so I challenged him as to how someone would
know the Mr. McCrae was on Bob's airplane and then called them in Riverside to
report it. The story seemed to change to they had strong intel internally. Never
an admission that they screwed up. Just more reasons why their intel is solid.
Even at one point denying it is their intel-- "it comes from somewhere else--
they are just the middle man." Tony said they are all ex military and are all
pilots so I pointed oujt that the fax has numerous errors and the
FARs contains no language allowing detention of a pilot for failing
to have his medical or logbook on his person (look for that to change as CBP
will probably write criminal regulations re: pilots) . The whole time I
could hear a beep every ten seconds or so probably indicating I was being
recorded. Althoug Tony was pleasant there was no progress on this issue. None.
I spoke with my congressman's senior staffer as well. I relayed the details
of the issue to her and she seemed sincerely interested. She said it is best to
generate a letter from our organizations (we are) and forward that with a
personal note to all of our congressmen. She said I should be
carefull so that I don't become a target.
All for now.
Jeff "Bullseye" Edwards
|