X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2) with ESMTPS id 4933481 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:22:12 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.82.180; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so459295wyj.25 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:21:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yU0a0yRiqtrBtz4BTHZUztF5d3xxNAETyB3UAzFlc4Y=; b=K+GGlOMr7bdkyWgj0I1RhXLsggBIdvEgqKsrRjq5pF7HqlitS1RMhHsJVVxWztWuGM cVMPnxv8lBv4pxK+QsC6f5M4U4AtSlLkfxJzuCoSef4pfFbohIPJYX6r84IYTNImEomj Q4meRAMwlyiMaOUH2jApIKrsaXGCtCV/juHnY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YvoBWPZyxKRDc+JiCo/lgJ6IDfun401KuEJ9vv5k28GdVUyjZ0e6tGxX/nbxdJ/151 RA2BJGB2kI0TmfmYsMPL+TzBze/PBBQW/DAwEWxdgoVia9lLiFvjRXXclxabDxnFhEhv olW/FukrP66QZkQRVazVuK7MdAORzOgQwUagw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.179.196 with SMTP id h46mr7983184wem.78.1302020495185; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.52.8 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:21:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:21:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Tracy RV-8 Questions From: Tracy To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fafff1b218304a02e4526 --0016367fafff1b218304a02e4526 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Doug, I have 48 hours on the RV-8 but almost all of them done on short test flights while working out various development problems so I have never done tests on the intended use of the airplane (long distance cruise at high altitude). The most interesting thing (to me anyway) is that the fuel burn at low altitude is virtually identical at the same speeds as the RV4 with a Renesis. This is partly due to the longer wing and the high pitch prop which makes the engine rpm 1000 rpm lower than the -4 at the same speed. I haven't done formal glide ratio tests but it is very obvious that it's significantly better than the -4, also due to the longer wing. I thought the stall speed was much lower too but my previous statement about it being down to 45 mph was due to a bad air speed sensor in the Bluemountain EFIS. It's really closer to 50. Top speed is airframe limited at 230 mph. That's reached at around 25" MP. Cooling is working OK and when I install the bellmouth inlet rings on the inlets I think it will be in final form. Right now I have what amounts to 5" pitot tubes sticking out of the cowl for inlets. Not good at high angle of attack in climb. Climb at solo flight & 1/2 fuel is around 3750 fpm. Seat of the pants impression: One hell of a fun airplane to fly. Tracy On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:27 AM, wrote: > Tracy if you get a chance would mind taking a minute to post the latest > news on your RV-8 20B? I know I am curious about your cruise numbers and > fuel burn and also what your feelings are about it's handling and overall > performance based on the extended wing you put on it. Also, do you have the > cooling system tweaked now where you like it or are there further gains to > had / made? > > Take care, > > Doug Lomheim > RV-9A / FWF / Electrical / Canopy > > Hope to resume work by mid - May. > > --0016367fafff1b218304a02e4526 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Doug,
=A0=A0=A0 I have 48 hours on the RV-8 but almost all of them do= ne on short test flights while working out various development problems so = I have never done tests on the intended use of the airplane (long distance = cruise at high altitude).

=A0 The most interesting thing (to me anyway) is that the fuel burn at = low altitude is virtually identical at the same speeds as the RV4 with a Re= nesis.=A0=A0 This is partly due to the longer wing and the high pitch prop = which makes the engine rpm 1000 rpm lower than the -4 at the same speed.=A0=

I haven't done formal glide ratio tests but it is very obvious that= it's significantly better than the -4, also due to the longer wing.=A0= I thought the stall speed was much lower too but my previous statement abo= ut it being down to 45 mph was due to a bad air speed sensor in the Bluemou= ntain EFIS.=A0 It's really closer to 50.=A0=A0 Top speed is airframe li= mited at 230 mph.=A0 That's reached at around 25" MP.

Cooling is working OK and when I install the bellmouth inlet rings on t= he inlets I think it will be in final form.=A0=A0 Right now I have what amo= unts to 5" pitot tubes sticking out of the cowl for inlets.=A0=A0 Not = good at high angle of attack in climb.=A0=A0 Climb at solo flight & 1/2= fuel is around 3750 fpm.

Seat of the pants impression:=A0=A0 One hell of a fun airplane to fly.<= br>
Tracy

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:27= AM, <dlomheim@ao= l.com> wrote:
Tracy if you get a chance would mind taking a minute to post the lates= t news on your RV-8 20B?=A0 I know I am curious about your cruise numbers a= nd fuel burn and also what your feelings are about it's handling and ov= erall performance based on the extended wing you put on it.=A0 Also, do you= have the cooling system tweaked now where you like it or are there further= gains to had / made?
=A0
Take care,
=A0
Doug Lomheim
RV-9A / FWF / Electrical / Canopy
=A0
Hope to resume work by mid - May.


--0016367fafff1b218304a02e4526--