X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2o) with ESMTP id 4892355 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:37:18 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.104; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net Received: from desktop (adsl-85-145-79.mco.bellsouth.net[98.85.145.79]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP id <20110306023642H040015dt2e>; Sun, 6 Mar 2011 02:36:42 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [98.85.145.79] From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Miss above staging point. Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 21:36:43 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001E_01CBDB7D.6C0C2000" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acvbi8fYlFhDkSOfSoG4hpVwB/8pxgAG3D3g X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CBDB7D.6C0C2000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mark, I have the stock Renesis coils. Bill B _____ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Mark Steitle Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 6:19 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Miss above staging point. Bill, Which coils are you running? I chased an intermittent miss which occurred in the 6000 -7000 range. I upgraded to the LS2 "Yukon" coils and the miss was gone. Mark S. On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote: I have developed a miss above the staging point. The fuel pressure seems ok, the mixture also seems ok. I am at a loss. To try and troubleshoot, I am considering getting above the staging point and disabling the primaries and secondaries to see if I can identify which is the cause. Since it runs ok below the stage, I assume it is not the primaries. I recently changed my fuel filters and installed a large canister filter. There seems a possibility that I introduced some contamination that clogged an injector. Other wise it seems it must be spark related. This just happened one flight ago. The engine was running fine, till that last takeoff. It was missing and would only get about 6300 rpm. After take off, I turned the prop back and slowed the engine down to below that number and it smoothed out and ran fine the res of the flight. Today while taxiing around, I noticed that the miss was back. Opinions welcomed. Bill B ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CBDB7D.6C0C2000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mark,

 

I have the stock Renesis = coils.

 

Bill B

 

From: = Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Mark Steitle
Sent: Saturday, March 05, = 2011 6:19 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Miss above staging point.

 

Bill, 

 

Which coils are you running?  I chased an intermittent miss = which occurred in the 6000 -7000 range.  I upgraded to the LS2 = "Yukon" = coils and the miss was gone.  

 

Mark = S.

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>= wrote:

I have developed a miss above the staging point.  The = fuel pressure seems ok, the mixture also seems ok.  I am at a = loss.

 

To try and troubleshoot, I am considering getting above the = staging point and disabling the primaries and secondaries to see if I can = identify which is the cause.  Since it runs ok below the stage, I assume it = is not the primaries.

 

I recently changed my fuel filters and installed a large = canister filter.  There seems a possibility  that I introduced some contamination that clogged an injector.  Other wise it seems it = must be spark related.  This just happened one flight ago.  The engine = was running fine, till that last takeoff.  It was missing and would = only get about 6300 rpm.  After take off, I turned the prop back and slowed = the engine down to below that number and it smoothed out and ran fine the = res of the flight.  Today while taxiing around, I noticed that the miss = was back.

 

Opinions welcomed.

 

Bill B

 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CBDB7D.6C0C2000--