Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 09:18:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <13brv3@mchsi.com> Received: from sccmmhc01.mchsi.com ([204.127.203.183] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1860137 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 08:56:23 -0500 Received: from rad ([12.218.64.232]) by sccmmhc01.mchsi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20021111135605.EPDP23765.sccmmhc01.mchsi.com@rad> for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:56:05 +0000 Reply-To: <13brv3@mchsi.com> From: <13brv3@mchsi.com> X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] rx7s and turbos and RV-3s X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 07:56:06 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 You might check around for another rx7 t2 turbo, if you change your mind on engine configuration. I just got one complete for $285 from The Parts Trader (which started out as the 'rx7 parts trader'). Put an ad in the "wanted" section. The one I got was pristine. And you could always make your own cowl! [Marc Wiese] --------------- I think I've decided to pursue having Bruce T go through my new engine to raise the compression, and do some porting. Of course this doesn't mean that I won't ever add a turbo for normalization, but it does make it pretty unlikely. I have to make my own cowl either way, so the bump is doable, but I'm getting more worried about the weight. The new mount is a bit heavier than the original, and turbo/manifold feels like an anvil. The RV-3 was actually meant to work with the O-290 engine originally, and even the O-320 is heavy for the airframe, so I think I would be over any reasonable CG limit with the addition of a turbo system. The best thing I can do now is to forge ahead with a full power NA engine, then consider the turbo later in the build if weight allows. My goal for this plane is spectacular performance, and I know that I won't be happy with the current 87 spec turbo engine, minus the turbo. Cheers,