X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Received: from nm19.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.89] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with SMTP id 4639849 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:49:36 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.89; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from [98.139.91.66] by nm19.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Dec 2010 20:49:01 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.52] by tm6.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Dec 2010 20:49:01 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1052.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Dec 2010 20:49:01 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 665145.48202.bm@omp1052.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 92232 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Dec 2010 20:49:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1292273340; bh=NpZy93BQud32zspZDCifUm3Fur38EgTHmSPcosXQqf0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uF3tdGBemMniedu0FojjXHkZAjF0gaulj9RCgxEZB4PQrAM0Piw30QKN+t38jIBQkJxKW2eY5/9SiCyBBQ4RAA5k0XmJYQj9nE0gOlHkFX8I6M56T17XkYwMWyeeDyotjiD29Htz9EbkBHHSJTdwYX5/1Ivb/4FAmNqms9JU57k= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=att.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RSIP79Y6EuzW+MpMi5Ut39RF0IJSx2VUi5L7WUDT8ONRPxoW4i67c2Rx7d9mFLTB91SSvpV5FB+pJoZffkd0OW5N8KbAGfZZMIDXJNPmGP9OMbMVjyKm71qVzoCXYZ2sH6ASJC/WwWXCSiyMs+C7GvNcQI89ljOALW4EmLBTzYY=; Message-ID: <580219.91967.qm@web83914.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 3_DBMAsVM1n5s8WCLWuCVhkjmbTKQNVg.5LfM291PPxuLlL RtTEhH6XktqoZZTfv6ULDFMN2HQ5ECtrxOdQQag7su6R1csJe9X9QHGaVKpc EcJMap7TDG43wXAqGCeFRIEpEfynz6Ws7SQpo.HY7HVN3537cdAVy49oQhXs rEBps8rQg.ppRi3M3I4_azkIK7RCmzgAHKOsAP19UCpwWQh4X2H5HuBWAQQW 5mentonuSUSE0R2GLVeqRL0Ok8ynELrYAkyFGMAWS34hezqRxne.wnSBBZqu u6jmDDuzxWw-- Received: from [208.114.32.20] by web83914.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:49:00 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <1ecf9c.7717c2cd.3a37c556@aol.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:49:00 -0800 (PST) From: Kelly Troyer Subject: Re: Fw: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Water temps To: CozyGirrrl@aol.com Cc: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: <1ecf9c.7717c2cd.3a37c556@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1775842037-1292273340=:91967" --0-1775842037-1292273340=:91967 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chrissi,=0A=A0=A0=A0 My own opinion is that after warm up and in flight the= oil temp leaving the =0Aengine before the =0A=0Acoolers (air or water=A0 t= o oil) will almost always be well above =0A160-180=A0F..............If it i= s not this=0Ahigh then the=A0oil to water cooler will actually help warm it= to a more efficient =0Atemp.........IMHO=0A=0A=A0=A0 Somebody correct me i= f this is a fallacy !!.......................<:)=0A=0AKelly Troyer=0A"DYKE = DELTA JD2" (Eventually)=0A"13B ROTARY"_ Engine=0A"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2=0A"MIST= RAL"_Backplate/Oil Manifold=0A"TURBONETICS"_TO4E50 Turbo=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A____= ____________________________=0AFrom: "CozyGirrrl@aol.com" =0ATo: keltro@att.net=0ASent: Mon, December 13, 2010 12:52:06 PM=0ASubje= ct: Re: Fw: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Water temps=0A=0AThis is where I get confus= ed:=0A=0Asaid previously, =0A-ideal water temp =3D 160*~180*F=0A-ideal oil = temp =3D 160*F=0A=0AIf we are cooling oil with water that is at best hotter= than the ideal temp of =0Athe oil, then are we not adding heat to it rathe= r than removing it? =0A=0A=0AIf we are trying to cool oil, why would we fee= d the highest temp water to the =0Aoil/water cooler rather than the coolest= temp water by tapping into the pump =0Ahousing where it enters the block?= =0A=0ABased on feedback, the water entering the block may be as low as 150*= ~160*F, =0Awould this be cool enough to do an adequate job of cooling the o= il?=0A=0AAlso, which model of Mocal is being used?=0A=0A...Chrissi --0-1775842037-1292273340=:91967 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=0A
Chrissi,
=0A
    My own opi= nion is that after warm up and in flight the oil temp leaving the engine be= fore the
=0A
coolers (air or water  to oil) will almost alwa= ys be well above 160-180 F..............If it is not this
=0Ahigh then the oil to water cooler will actually help warm it to a mor= e efficient temp.........IMHO
=0A
 
=0A
  = Somebody correct me if this is a fallacy !!.......................<:)=0A
 
=0A

Kelly Troyer
"DYKE = DELTA JD2" (Eventually)

=0A

"13B= ROTARY"_ Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"MISTRAL"_Backplate/Oil Manifold<= /P>=0A

"TURBONETICS"_TO4E50 Turbo

=0A

=0A

=0A
=0A
=0AFrom: "CozyGirrrl@aol.com" <CozyGirrrl@aol.com>=
To: keltro@att.net
<= B>Sent: Mon, December 13, 2010= 12:52:06 PM
Subject: Re= : Fw: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Water temps

=0A
This is where I get confuse= d:
=0A
 
=0A
said previously,
=0A
-ideal w= ater temp =3D 160*~180*F
=0A
-ideal oil temp =3D 160*F
=0A 
=0A
If we are cooling oil with water that is at best hott= er than the ideal temp of the oil, then are we not adding heat to it rather= than removing it?
=0A
 
=0A
If we are trying to co= ol oil, why would we feed the highest temp water to the oil/water cooler ra= ther than the coolest temp water by tapping into the pump housing where it = enters the block?
=0A
 
=0A
Based on feedback, the w= ater entering the block may be as low as 150*~160*F, would this be cool eno= ugh to do an adequate job of cooling the oil?
=0A
 
=0A<= DIV>Also, which model of Mocal is being used?
=0A
 
=0A<= DIV>...Chrissi
--0-1775842037-1292273340=:91967--