Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #5223
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Radiator ducting
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:26:22 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> > Hi Ed,
> >
> > As usual I didn't pay attention when I should have.
> > I'm now replacing the right radiator for the 2nd time (this time with a
> > new one) and am starting to look at proper ducting.
> >
> > Bernie Kerr suggested pointing the inlet in the direction of the
> > slipstream from the prop to increase ram effect.
> > Looking the the inlets on some turboprop installations it seems the
> > clearance between rear side of prop and tip of inlet lip is quite small.
> > My RV-3 cowling tapers back from the center to maybe 5" at the outside
> > of the cowling.
> > Would there be any negative effect on prop efficiency if one were to
> > extend the outside of the cowling out close (1" or less) to the trailing
> > edge of the prop?
> >
> > Which brings me to the next question: With proper ducting, what is your
> > currently recommended mininum inlet area? I'm considering a circular
> > inlet as in Dave Anders RV-4 (see the Mustang II in Feb 2004 Kit
Planes").
> > The advantage of moving the inlet forward would be a longer duct, closer
> > to the optimal 7 degree maximum.
> > Would having the inlet real close to the prop also increase pressure in
> > the duct?
> >
> > Others are welcome to chime in here too :)
> >
> > Finn
> >
Finn,

    I would not go below about 18 square inches initially.  I did reduce one
of my duct openings to around 9-10 square inches, but left the other one at
24 square inches.  Cooling is still fine (increased coolant temp by 5F), but
I suspect the 24 Square inche one is carrying more of the load.   K&W
indicates that if your inlet opening is below a certain critical ratio then
the losses go way up.  Using the 95 square inches of the cores I calculated
that 18 square inches was a good minimum.  If you duct shape and outlet are
close to optimum you could go smaller, but then things have got to be just
right.  I know that 24 square inches per core works great, and my total
coolant inlet are is now at 33 square inches and still cooled on 90F day.  I
would pay particular attention to the lower lip of your inlet making certain
it has a sort of airfoil curve to it so that air will find an easy path when
the nose is up relative to the airstream (like during your climb).

Don't have a clue as to whether the "round" inlets are better, some folks
believe so.  Van sort of poop pooed the idea at one dinner.


Ed Anderson

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster