X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.202] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.7) with SMTP id 4336060 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:58:55 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.198.202; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: (qmail 25630 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2010 02:58:20 -0000 Received: from [192.168.10.7] (ceengland@98.95.179.240 with plain) by smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 Jun 2010 19:58:19 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: uXJ_6LOswBCr8InijhYErvjWlJuRkoKPGNeiuu7PA.5wcGoy X-YMail-OSG: 4jUTK3kVM1mUDwD8ErI6EX6jtaDHKiM7UiV09oPBt2Tos5RIpP5R4eIl.pvcjFxjXjqN.lz3sjc78Aw6M37fiQ163SEKO2jBFWglGh.sGIIFPRB.ALT.iaspX4FEV16uRnG.T7XPU.AlS0kKb9ky6qowI2gJyxlqLB12Gm4Pa71FdPpwHUTL0NmuCJXNcFSgTJOn3C1N30RL5nX528Q0mbOlZOfQPpdHs8ZenZ4EKdoOzWSmHPxExZ2NHR9bcGcRbWxFkXVD0Y2xT0Y- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4C086BCB.4090707@bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:58:19 -0500 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: high/low pressure pumps question References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Ed, thanks for the info. Yours was actually the only photo I could find during a quick search. I'm guessing that the regulator will be bypassing 6 or 8 times the amount of fuel the engine consumes, so that would seem to be at least twice the volume the Facet is capable of pumping. If no one has plowed this ground yet, I suppose that some experimentation is in order. Charlie On 6/3/2010 6:31 PM, Ed Anderson wrote: > > Hi Charlie, > > All my pumps, but the Facet, are on the forward face of the Firewall, > so can’t help you there. > > Regarding “T” the Facet pump, Pressure will generally overwhelm > volume, you can think of a large mass of slow moving fluid as being > effectively a stationary pool of liquid (taking it to the extreme of > no motion), so a higher pressure fluid would simply squirt into the > larger volume liquid similar to as it if were a large tank). Yes, if > the larger mass were moving at a much higher velocity, it might in > effect offer a shearing force across the opening to the facet pump and > have detrimental effect (possibly) – but I doubt you are going to have > that kind of fluid velocity in your return line. > > Ed > > Ed Anderson > > Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered > > Matthews, NC > > eanderson@carolina.rr.com > > http://www.andersonee.com > > http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html > > http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW > > > http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] > *On Behalf Of *Charlie England > *Sent:* Thursday, June 03, 2010 5:22 PM > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] high/low pressure pumps question > > A couple of questions: > > Have any of you RV-x builders considered putting your pumps on the aft > side of the spar, to keep the cabin & engine compartment 'clean'? It > looks like it would be possible, by using the existing holes for wire > in the center section (RV-7). If not, are you just putting them under > the center cover between the seats & raising it up a bit? > > Also, how about running the transfer (Facet) pump's output line T-d > into the main pump's return line? There should be minimal pressure, > but will the high pressure pump's much larger volume overwhelm the > modest Facet transfer pump? (Or, maybe venturi effect would eliminate > the need for a Facet....) > > Thanks, > > Charlie >