You are correct, George. Unless you go to
variable length/volume induction systems, the peak power can be fairly narrow.
So that is why I tell folks they have to make decision about where they want
the power peak.
I personally chose take power 6000-6200
rpm – because I never (well, only to test) fly at WOT, burns too much
fuel, I’m too cheap and don’t have to be anyplace in that much of a
hurry. I always say if you don’t clear the trees, top speed doesn’t
matter. Clearly you need to chose the operating environment you plan operate
in and select your tuning to match it.
Ed
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of George Lendich
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010
8:28 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tuned
lengths?
Ben I hear you, sadly, if I read the articles right, the
tuning goes to Zero, 500 rpm above or below the tuning point. So one has
to select their best performance at either take-off or cruise. I would
probably select cruise.
Yup.... But. The design parameters are alot different for
an application that need usable power from 1500 to 9000 rpm, Like in a car.. We
only need good performance around 5500 - 7000, plus or minus a
little,,who the heck cares how the thing idles or pulls strong at 8900. .
That narrow powerband for aircraft applications is what I was
speaking about. YMMV
Ben Haas
www.haaspowerair.com
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
From: lendich@aanet.com.au
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:55:40 +1000
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tuned lengths?
I agree tuning is necessary all designs are slightly
different.
On the subject of intake design, I don't think Mazda came up
with their fancy Renesis intake by chance, I'm pretty sure that would be a
computer proven design, well before production.
Lynn does such a great job at painting
a very clear picture of the dynamics of an internal combustion engine.. Thank
you sir... As a side note those of us using an engine in close to a
steady state application are very lucky because tuning the intake is alot
easier then in a application that has a wide powerband range. A coupleof sharp
motor tuners and a day or so on a good repeatable dyno can zero in on
acceptable intake design that should set a good baseline for what really works.
You can sliderule / use fancy computer programs and other methods of
determining optimum designs but nothing trumps real time data in a running
engine. Just my .02 cents worth.
Ben Haas
www.haaspowerair.com
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:09:18 -0400
From: lehanover@gmail.com
Subject: [FlyRotary] Tuned lengths?
A "tuned" intake covers a wide Varity of
techniques ranging for Hermholtz,
RAM, Dynamic Intake, Inertia, etc,. There are basically three
conceptually
different approaches although they tend to merge under certain conditions.
You have the resonant tuning, the pulse tuning and the inertia turning
concepts. However, truth be known all three phenomena occur in most
intake
systems - it's a matter of emphasis.
The thing that really complicates it is the fact that within any induction
or exhaust system you have Finite Amplitude Waves - the power of these pulse
makes a 135 db sound wave very puny - these pulses can actually pound metal
apart. They do not interact linearly as do "sound waves" - in
fact they can
respond in what at first seems to be weird ways. For instance they may
reverse there "polarity" depending on whether they encounter an open
or
closed termination.
It has only been with the advent of digital computers has it been practical
to even try and model the effects of these waves in an induction system.
I
find them fascinating.
Here are a few references that some of you might find interesting.
http://home.earthlink.net/~redcat/pulse_ram/theory.html
http://www.motionsoftware.com/simtech.htm
http://www.proracingsim.com/dynomationmainpage.htm
http://www.audietech.com/DMfeaturetable.htm
Ed Anderson
Side intake port engines produce different tuned effects
than do Periphery ported intake engines.
Side exhaust ported engines produce different tuned
effects than do periphery ported exhaust engines.
The most powerfull engine would be the Periphery intake
and exhaust ported engines.
Although the intake and exhaust open and close events are
reported in degrees of crankshaft rotation
just like a side port engine, the periphery ports never
actually close. So, tuned lengths produce bigger changes than in the side
ported engine. So, one end of the tune length is virtually open all of the
time, and worse one end is exposed to changeing pressures all of the time.
The overlap (Intake and exhaust open at the same time) is
huge. So exhaust back pressure can poison the intake quite badly.
In the side intake ported engine one end of the column is
closed solid by the side of the rotor. Intake and exhaust overlap may be
minimal or extensive. Column lengths produce crisp tuning. Overlap with
peripheral exhaust ports may have less effect. Exhaust back pressure can remove
much power.
Side intake and exhaust Renesis) may have no overlap at
all. The center exhaust ports share an exit that is too large right at the port
face. Even with no overlap, the intake can be poisoned by exhaust gasses being
held in the chamber by a poor exhaust system. Exhaust system has three
outlets
Possibly less sensitive to back pressure than other
designs When converted to a Periphery intake port, may still have low overlap.
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail
from your inbox. Get started.