Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #50134
From: Bryan Winberry <bryanwinberry@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis t...
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:15:04 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Bill,

Would appreciate photos when conditions allow.  Although, hadn’t planned on P-Port for my Renny.

Bryan

….need to copyright the term “Renny”

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of WRJJRS@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:58 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis t...

 

In a message dated 2/16/2010 1:29:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, lendich@aanet.com.au writes:

Bryan,

I'm hearing you, I guess you mean the Renesis manifold. Maybe someone can duplicate that in carbon fiber, in a more compact form. I know - another job for Bill Jepson.

George (down under)

Bryan and George,

 The P-port insert used on the PS equipment duplicates an arrangement that Everett and Steve came up with that, in my opinion is near perfect for aircraft use. It is a simple tube bent back over the top of the engine. The mount is unique and I can't think on a better way to do the job. The intake is a thin-wall steel tube with an inlet bell on the end in a plenum. It is tough, lighter than most composite tubes would end up being, and easily modified for length. I work with a lot of carbon and could do better given time...for about 10x the cost. As an engineer I really believe in KIASAP a variation of the KISS principle. KIASAP is keep it as simple as possible, under our conditions.

Bill Jepson

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster