X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTP id 4120349 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:23:38 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.41; envelope-from=rv-4mike@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100211022303.UWAE12229.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:23:03 -0500 Received: from willsPC ([68.105.86.80]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id gSNr1d0081k005Q04SNsMP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:22:52 -0500 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=3OYv9oSQMPl2mzQJct9Z0gr0/14v7p3aTRAVsPGESI0= c=1 sm=1 a=pM2m0PL5Ha8A:10 a=XruvlouZCDbGUgEaRUiNZQ==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=8fvOh1mKAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=ObtsQhBqeyGyp9nLk0kA:9 a=MyhTsJ2JesHaw2k1tkAA:7 a=EjoT96oz1DXlARIlfWKpwT5DpewA:4 a=5zrLeAV0Z70A:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=SVqzirnCOXUA:10 a=651zF1QZEjFl0_Mc:21 a=_IK-iR8hEp1GgN7Y:21 a=XruvlouZCDbGUgEaRUiNZQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <1076E18026AC42638BE431F6DE866183@willsPC> From: "Mike Wills" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:22:50 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 You built a mill, a furnace, and are casting your own impeller for the supercharger that you designed and built? When did you have time to build an airplane???? I feel so inadequate.... Mike -------------------------------------------------- From: "Ernest Christley" Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:08 AM To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo > David Leonard wrote: >> HI Don, >> I think a turbo is not a bad idea and will definitely add available horse >> power. But first a reminder of a few of the downsides: >> Added weight and complexity >> Additional cooling requirements >> Some loss of efficiency due to exhaust back pressure. >> Ok, now forget about that stuff and lets pick out a turbo. >> >> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Don Wallker > > wrote: >> >> Dear list, Turbo flyers and especially David Leonard, >> I've 16 flying hours on my RV-8 with a Renesis and all of >> Tracy's stuff and a Catto 76/88. The airplane flys great, just >> like an RV, no gliding time, and about 36 hours on the ground. SPECS >> Full throttle 8,000' 174 mph indicated, 2450 on the prop, water >> 185, oil 205, >> Climb out 110 mph, rate of climb, 1250'/min. Field elevation 5046. >> >> These are not bad numbers, but I would like better. > > > > How much better are your really looking for, Don? I've been working on a > "turbo" solution that either minimizes or eliminates the drawbacks that > David lists. The solution I have doesn't allow for nearly as much > manifold pressure, but adds no additional moving parts to the engine. > > I'm taking the intake air from around the side of the gearbox, through its > mounting plate. The flywheel will have an impeller attached to it. I > built a fiberglass shroud to enclose the area between the gearbox mounting > plate and the engine. Intake air is taken from this centrifugal pump. > > Pros: > -I never have to worry about surges, wastegates, pop-off valves, etc. The > blower will never exceed the engine RPM. > -I don't have to deal with an intercoolers, wastegates, pop-off valves, > etc or the problems that failure of these things would cause. I'm not > pumping the pressure up that high. > -I don't have to deal with exhaust back pressure. > -I don't have to deal with exhaust heat. > -Lightweight. I'm getting away with just the weight of a shroud and an > impeller. Projected to be less than 5lbs. > > Cons: > -Power increase will be limited to about 20Hp. Exact figure won't be > known until I get it put together. The test will be several static > run-ups, with intake air taken from the pump, without the pump, and > without the pump with the air blocked. The last test is to see how much > Hp the pump is eating. > -I still have to install a real muffler. > > At this point in the development, I have a gcode program to mill the > impeller out of foam on the CNC mill I built. The foam model will be used > for casting. I've built a furnace capable of melting enough aluminum to > do the casting from. I nearly have the lathe I bought in the fall set up > so that I can do some post-cast cleanup. I just have to finish building > the quick change tool post holders. > > Once I get the impeller built, I just have to finish building the muffler > and a prop and I'm ready for my first start. > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >