Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #49957
From: Tracy Crook <tracy@rotaryaviation.com>
Sender: <rwstracy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:34:54 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sun 100 flown at 500 ft.
Top speed on a normally aspirated aircraft is always best at sealevel.   Best fuel economy is reached up high.

Tracy

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Mike Wills <rv-4mike@cox.net> wrote:
When you guys put out these numbers (RPM, speed, etc...) would also be helpful to know at what altitude. I assume at or close to sea level? I havent yet made any speed runs at low altitude.
 
Mike

Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:27 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo

Tracy, if you have the data could you give us the  RPMs you saw at the 205 and 217.5 air speeds?

Dennis H.
Renesis RV-7A
Austin, Tx.

That was 209 and 217.5   

the 209 mph speed was with the 2.176 drive turning a 68 - 71 prop with engine turning 6300 , mixture leaned to 17 gph.  On other occasions I could push it to 6400 at best power mixture burning 20 gph.

The 217.5 mph was with a 2.85 drive turning a 74 - 88 prop with engine turning 7250.  I didn't get a good read on the fuel flow but obviously it would have been higher.  I remember requesting priority landing after the race due to low fuel.  

Neither run was done at best power mixture but leaned a few gph less than max.

Tracy

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster