X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTP id 4119249 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:56:57 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.123; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_lZFVVS9x50A:10 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=arxwEM4EAAAA:8 a=QdXCYpuVAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=ekHE3smAAAAA:20 a=UretUmmEAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=nUuTZ29dAAAA:8 a=_zTZf_mUGWcza0zBniwA:9 a=ovoSWAcdplCqQ_l6gDQA:7 a=FdwhFSNofpIkk5Bm5TvI1gLXSOgA:4 a=1vhyWl4Y8LcA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=XI6kmHfHQag3TlR3OGQA:7 a=Es-U4N2QmiGeZbAbOZ-0Is1pwokA:4 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.191.186.236 Received: from [75.191.186.236] ([75.191.186.236:4766] helo=computername) by cdptpa-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id EF/9B-03217-5FCA27B4; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:56:21 +0000 From: "Ed Anderson" Message-ID: To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:57:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0068_01CAAA26.A99E3F40" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Acqp4kIX2XknsXxgTxKT6FqCSiQsKAAbinuA This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0068_01CAAA26.A99E3F40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well, I claimed 4 MPH more on the top end, but what the heck it might have been 5-6 kts, I just wasn't interested in that end of the performance spectrum to pay a lot of attention nor attempt to nail it down.. Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com http://www.andersonee.com http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html http://www.flyrotary.com/ http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm _____ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Al Gietzen Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 6:47 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo Hp = C*V^3 Is that simple enough? Simple enough - and with some other numbers Ed gave I compute he should get 5-6 kts more top end. Al __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3267 (20080714) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ------=_NextPart_000_0068_01CAAA26.A99E3F40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well, I claimed 4 MPH more on the = top end, but what the heck it might have been 5-6 kts, I just wasn’t = interested in that end of the performance spectrum to pay a lot of attention nor = attempt to nail it down..

 

Ed

 

From: = Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Al Gietzen
Sent: Tuesday, February = 09, 2010 6:47 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to = turbo

 

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis = to turbo

 

Hp =3D = C*V^3

 

Is that simple enough?

Simple enough – and with = some other numbers Ed gave I compute he should get 5-6 kts more top = end.

Al



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus = signature database 3267 (20080714) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

------=_NextPart_000_0068_01CAAA26.A99E3F40--