X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from exhub003-1.exch003intermedia.net ([207.5.74.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTPS id 4022746 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:15:21 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.5.74.28; envelope-from=jwhaley@datacast.com Received: from EXVMBX003-5.exch003intermedia.net ([207.5.74.45]) by exhub003-1.exch003intermedia.net ([207.5.74.28]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:14:45 -0800 From: Jeff Whaley To: Rotary motors in aircraft Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:10:38 -0800 Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Cabin Heat (Was Oil Cooler) Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Cabin Heat (Was Oil Cooler) Thread-Index: Acp9z3ppuSboqS9CR9+Pdl27QqwZ8gAFLfyk Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C03ABB0A7362B84BB53D544B3C305E0E0153A48C1E2CEXVMBX0035e_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C03ABB0A7362B84BB53D544B3C305E0E0153A48C1E2CEXVMBX0035e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, the CO is a worry but the heat muff is very light weight and provides= instantaneous heat. Jeff ________________________________ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Mark Steitle [msteitle@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:41 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Cabin Heat (Was Oil Cooler) Jeff, I'm considering going to a heat muff since there is sooooooo much exhaust h= eat that's just going to waste. I was going to incorporate it into the hea= t shield of my newest muffler design. Of course, I'll need to add a CO det= ector in the cabin for safety. Mark On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Whaley > wrote: Well with 3 coolers already, I didn=92t want to add a heater core and all t= he plumbing =96 I may move my scavenge point from oil cooler to water radia= tor as it is below the engine (uphill for warm air) and closer to the firew= all (fewer corners to turn). I picked the oil cooler because at the time my= oil temp was higher than water temp =96 now it=92s the other way around = =85 also the outlet of oil cooler as installed is less likely to get contam= inated with exhaust fumes. Jeff --_000_C03ABB0A7362B84BB53D544B3C305E0E0153A48C1E2CEXVMBX0035e_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yeah, t= he CO is a worry but the heat muff is very light weight and provides i= nstantaneous heat.
Jeff
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [fl= yrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Mark Steitle [msteitle@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:41 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Cabin Heat (Was Oil Cooler)

Jeff,
I'm considering going to a heat muff since there is sooooooo= much exhaust heat that's just going to waste.  I was going to incorpo= rate it into the heat shield of my newest muffler design.  Of course, = I'll need to add a CO detector in the cabin for safety.
 
Mark

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Whaley <jwhaley@datacast.com> wrote:

Well= with 3 coolers already, I didn=92t want to add a heater core and all the p= lumbing =96 I may move my scavenge point from oil cooler to water radiator = as it is below the engine (uphill for warm air) and closer to the firewall (fewer corners to turn). I picked the oil = cooler because at the time my oil temp was higher than water temp =96 now i= t=92s the other way around =85 also the outlet of oil cooler as installed i= s less likely to get contaminated with exhaust fumes.

Jeff=

--_000_C03ABB0A7362B84BB53D544B3C305E0E0153A48C1E2CEXVMBX0035e_--