X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-bw0-f226.google.com ([209.85.218.226] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTP id 4022319 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:07:37 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.218.226; envelope-from=msteitle@gmail.com Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so248515bwz.27 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:07:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gvYKx8GjROLHKfSa0aAWiFu3Iudac9EYIt9AAWnEZxg=; b=d1wOrhGgLwvAE5MjSZ8Qo1mszqXJOSo+HTwpbrbo/AJeVJgM5hWCQqxOSNPODmuYgY b9RL6VVWBe6nWzHO7LLNmW3ur9Hf95NLlJdSeoSHE9VopTJhLwcRnyipHG6L9niLsuyU f3XXjoupQByLj8A4DT7BjWEGYkWAQyXdcI4nQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OQnInNMsl0UWB1IKFCUu05/Rt2NwuoayyZirDut5loquqLYXNDpv+zCOqLe+MAMrcz qxvXoteMYSkrg/VXotQpPG4KbvelIIP20sEvp0ytelKeGW81e5DfFnc9lXawE8FKeIhK nqZDmPOKddgH1KuLRlf7xMsQ6r6cKhsb3iwV0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.34.209 with SMTP id m17mr10363bkd.34.1260907620401; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:07:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:07:00 -0600 Message-ID: <5cf132c0912151207m480ec8e1g50109433e3997326@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Oil cooling From: Mark Steitle To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555992ecf037c047ac9ee33 --00032555992ecf037c047ac9ee33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Lynn, Its funny. I own a rotary-powered airplane, but have never owned a rotary powered auto. (I may have to do something about that.) After 150 hours flying behind a rotary, there's no way I would ever consider switching to a recip. Mark On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Lynn Hanover wrote: > "How can you screw this up?" > > Given enough time, I'm sure I can figure a way. ;-) > > Mark > > The little problems that often get blamed on the rotary are also common to > all engine installations. There are parallels all along the way. So the > light at the end of the tunnel is the same for everyone. The engine type, I > propose makes little difference. > > The advantage of the rotary is that it is rugged in the extreme. I bought > my wife an RX-3 many years ago for $500.00. It was as new inside and out. It > had been purchased used by a well off fellow for his daughter to drive to > OSU. It served her well. The oil in the sump was the same oil that was in it > when they bought it. It had become hard to start. The sump oil (the few cups > left) was as thick as axle grease and had a bitter foul smell. It was hard > to start with low compression even though it was summer time. I took it home > on the race car trailer. I took off the pan and scrapped out the muck. I put > on a new filter and installed oil mixed with a quart of auto trans fluid. I > installed a used OMP with some good plastic lines, and ran the engine for a > few hours. I dumped that out and put in some 50 weight Valvoline racing oil > and another new filter. The worn out oil scrapers let by enough Valvoline to > keep the compression up and made starting easy. The smoking was minimal. > That engine lasted another three years. One day it locked up solid without > warning. The apex seals had worn down to so short, that one fell out of the > groove and got run over. The housings were missing all of the chrome. The > irons were badly grooved and even the crank was scored and useless. But > almost all of that happened before I bought the car. > > The learning curve is not steeper. It is just a bit different. The reward > is a reliable engine with minimal operating costs. > > Lynn E. Hanover > --00032555992ecf037c047ac9ee33 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lynn,
=A0
Its funny.=A0 I own a rotary-powered airplane, but have never owned a = rotary powered auto.=A0 (I may have to do something about that.)=A0 After 1= 50 hours flying behind a rotary, there's no way I would=A0ever consider= switching to a recip.=A0
=A0
Mark

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Lynn Hanover <= span dir=3D"ltr"><lehanover@gmail= .com> wrote:
"How can you screw this up?"<= /div>
=A0
Given enough time, I'm sure I can figure a way.=A0 ;-)
=A0
Mark
=A0
The little problems that often get blamed on the rotary are also commo= n to all engine installations. There are parallels all along the way. So th= e light at the end of the tunnel is the same for everyone. The engine type,= I propose makes little difference.
=A0
The advantage of the rotary is that it is rugged in the extreme. I bou= ght my wife an RX-3 many years ago for $500.00. It was as new inside and ou= t. It had been purchased used by a well off fellow for his daughter to driv= e to OSU. It served her well. The oil in the sump was the same oil that was= in it when they bought it. It had become hard to start. The sump oil (the = few cups left) was as thick as axle grease and had a bitter foul smell. It = was hard to start with low compression even though it was summer time. I to= ok it home on the race car trailer. I took off the pan and scrapped out the= muck. I put on a new filter and installed oil=A0mixed with a=A0quart of au= to trans fluid. I installed a used OMP with some good plastic lines, and ra= n the engine for a few hours. I dumped that out and put in some 50 weight V= alvoline racing oil and another new filter.=A0The worn out oil scrapers let= by enough Valvoline to keep the compression up and made starting easy. The= smoking was minimal. That engine lasted another three years. One day it lo= cked up solid without warning. The apex seals had worn down to so short, th= at one fell out of the groove and got run over. The housings were missing a= ll of the chrome. The irons were badly grooved and even the crank was score= d and useless. But almost all of that happened before I bought the car.
=A0
The learning curve is not steeper. It is just a bit different. The rew= ard is a reliable engine with minimal operating costs.=A0
=A0
Lynn E. Hanover

--00032555992ecf037c047ac9ee33--