Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #48957
From: Steve Thomas <glasair2@me.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] FW: Fuel Filter \ Ethanol
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:46:42 -0800
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
To All,

This is a good opportunity for me to mention some tests that I have been running on ethanol.  I posted the following message on the Glasair List regarding the use of ethanol-laced gasoline.  Note that the Glasair resin system, Derakane 411, is supposed to be safe for up to 10% ethanol.  But here is what  I found:

______________

Here is an update on the gasohol tests that I have been 
running. The witness samples that I have put into the test 
jars are all from either my own or the original factory 
layups, all using Derakane 411 of some sort. I used the -
45 for a long time, but switched to -350 sometime later 
as it was easier to get and wetted out better. I have three 
tests running as noted below:

1. The first test is with two samples in a jar with Jose 
Cuervo. Jose Cuervo is 40% ethanol. I have an original 
factory layup in there and one of my own that also has 
bondo on one side. I removed the samples from the jar 
and first rubbed my finger over the sample to see if 
anything would come off on my fingers. Nothing did. I 
thought that maybe if some material balled up under my 
finger rub, it would be telling. Then, I took a butter 
knofe, with a very dull edge, and scraped it vigorously 
over each surface. There was definitely a residue that 
came off the surface. The factory sample and my own 
sample had similar result. The bondo surface held, 
however, and did not produce and debris. The material 
that came off was slightly gooey, but did not go very 
deep. The scratch results could not be felt with my finger. 
it also required vigorous scratching to get it to come off. 

2. The next sample is a jar with gasohol at 5.7% ethanol, 
the current California formulation. This is soon to go up 
to 10%. I have three samples in this jar. One is an original 
factory layup, the second is a fresh layup I did a few 
weeks prior to starting the test. It was not post cured in 
any way. The third sample was from that same batch of 
recent layups, but was post cured at 200 degrees for 3 
hours. The factory sample was subjected to the scratch 
test mentioned above. A much smaller amount of residue 
came off, but a very little did. On the other two samples, 
there was no residue at all. The post-cure process did 
not make any difference. The results from my recent 
layups is what I was expecting, and was suitably 
disappointed when the factory layup (now 11 years old), 
showed signs of a residual buildup, however small. 
Again, it was much less than the Jose Cuervo sample, but 
it was there. And, it still required vigorous scratching to 
get it to come off. However, even a very small amount of 
that stuff is very disappointing.

3. The third jar has the same gasohol along with water. I 
did not have time to test that sample. I'll have to get back 
to you on that one.

These results are, indeed, disappointing. While I have 
totally conflicting reports on the effect of gasohol, where 
some say that it is wildly dangerous and others say that 
they have been flying with gasohol in their vinyl-ester 
tanks for 100s of hours with no problem, I remain 
concerned. One report that I remember came from this 
list and said that the ethanol generated bubbles in the 
fiberglass structure (IIRC). I found no such result. What I 
found was a very small amount of residue that required 
active scraping to get it to come off. 

But, this test has only been running for 2 months. The 
Jose Cuervo definitely generated an unacceptable amount 
of residue. This corresponds to the Derakane Chemical 
Resistance Chart that says gasohol up to 10 % should be 
OK, over that is not recommended. However, even in my 
5.7% sample, I found a little residue on the factory layup. 
Since the top and bottom of our gas tanks are done at the 
factory, this bring great concern.

Given these results, my choice is to run 100LL for now, 
until either I can find ethanol-free mogas, or there is a 
replacement for 100LL. 

I met someone a few weeks ago that is trying to develop a 
factory for producing butanol. Butanol is supposedly very 
similar to gasoline, in that it is nearly the same octane, it 
has almost as much energy, per gallon, and it is non-
corrosive. This guy is making it out of biomass, waste 
product, not foodstuffs. See the following link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butanol_fuel

But, until it is thoroughly tested, it looks like 100LL for me 
unless ethanol free mogas can be found. 

Steve
Super II RG


Best Regards,

Steve Thomas
_______________________________________________________





On Nov 5, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Bobby J. Hughes wrote:

 This is a response from Aeromotive regarding my fuel filter and ethanol. My fuel \ 2 stroke oil mixture also seems to be a different color with Ethanol in the mix. Has anyone else observed this?
 
 
Bobby Hughes
RV10 Renesis
 
 
 Yes, it’s fine.  However, watch as the ethanol/methanol gasoline blends will dissolve years of shellac and debris in the transport and underground storage containers which will then end up in someone’s gas tank.  You’ll need to make sure that the filter is serviced more frequently going forward; probably at least once a year in the spring and maybe once again mid-season over the first couple years.

 

Hope this helps, good luck and thanks for choosing Aeromotive!

 

Brett Clow

Aeromotive, Inc.

7805 Barton St.

Lenexa, KS  66214

913-647-7300  Ext. 109

 


From: Bobby J. Hughes [mailto:bhughes@qnsi.net]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 6:19 PM
To: tech@aeromotiveinc.com
Subject: Fuel Filter \ Ethenol

 

10 Micron Fabric element for 12308, P/N 12608

 

Ethanol is now at all Texas gas stations. Is this filter safe for 10% ethanol?

 

Thanks,

 

Bobby J Hughes

 


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster