Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.166.207] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 2898647 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 11:46:27 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 11:46:27 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <006a01c3c70e$0b023730$0000a398@Carol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "sqpilot@earthlink" : Hi again, Ed. Thank you very much for going into the details of my cooling system. My SQ2000 is a fairly fast aircraft. Normal climb speeds are between 120 and 140 mph. George Graham has a 13b powered side-by-side E Racer, which has a similar profile to mine, and he said that he takes off and climbs at 1/2 throttle. That statement, plus your input, makes me more comfortable that this radiator will work for me. I am more concerned about having a radiator that will cool my engine in cruise configuration, as that's where I will be spending 95% of my time flying. If necessary, I can always climb in "steps", allowing the engine to cool before resuming climb. The 16x10 radiator will make for a very neat, compact, and easy to duct installation. Thanks again for all of the time you have spent figuring out the cooling capabilities for me. Hope I can return the favor somehow in the future. Paul Conner, Mobile, AL