Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:28:18 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.46] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2897892 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:48:21 -0500 Received: from user-2injrl5.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.238.165] helo=Carol) by grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AXXAB-0004yD-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:48:20 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <00c701c3c6a3$ab6f68c0$0000a398@Carol> From: "sqpilot@earthlink" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator X-Original-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:47:53 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 7:31 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator > > > > Posted for "sqpilot@earthlink" : > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > Hi, Ed....Do I understand correctly that only one of these cores would > be > > needed to cool 160 HP at 120 MPH? Thanks. Paul Conner > > > > Hi Paul, > > No - sorry if I misled you. Unless the pass several weeks of studying > K&W are for naught, its fairly clear that for 160HP at 120MPH you need two > GM cores. Thanks, Ed.....I was relatively certain that it would take two cores....I was just fishing for that last ray of hope, that there might be a small frontal radiator or evap. core that could magically do what others have not been able to do. Proves the old saying....If it sounds too good to be true.... After putting my bottom cowling in place (several times), and making cardboard radiator core "dummies", the most practical radiator I came up with measures 16 x 10 x 3.5 inches overall. C&R Racing said they can make it for me with only 1 inch tanks, leaving more area for cooling fins. That would leave a total core area of 14 x 10 x 3.5 inches. That size would fit in my cowling without modifications, and very minimal effort to build the plenum. They quoted a cost of $500.00, including mounting two -16 male AN fittings, one 1/4"npt female drain hole, and mounting brackets as needed for my installation. It is all aluminum, and no epoxy. The radiator might be a little small for takeoff and climb?, but might have a chance of cooling 130 or so HP at cruise? A bit pricey, but maybe I can finally put this time consuming part of the equation behind me and continue getting this thing ready for flight. The other alternative I have is to have the radiator made 16" x 13" x 3.5", (core area of 14 x 13 x 3.5) but that will take more effort in trying to get the plenum stuffed in the cowling. Take care. Paul Conner