Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #47513
From: George Lendich <lendich@aanet.com.au>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 and Ed's EFISM - a great combination
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:00:57 +1000
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Ed,
I stand corrected.
I merely wanted to point out (to the initiated) the fact that RWS was an advancement in and improvement on the Ross.
All your points are well made.
George ( down under)

Actually, George, The RWS drive was not just a redevelopment of the Ross drive.  

 

Tracy basically started from scratch and engineered a redrive that was designed to meet certain objectives while achieving a reasonable cost.   There is no other redrive I am familiar with that has anywhere near the number of flying hours that the RWS redrive has with none of the problems associated with the Ross.

 

While there is a superficial similarly to the Ross (Prop on one end and rotary on the other, planetary gears in the middle {:>)) in appearance, the internals are considerably ahead of anything Ross had.  Pressure lubrication of the prop shaft for one thing, an integral thrust bearing for another, a removable propeller shaft for yet another, full oil pressure lubrication.  The Ross drive required a restrictor in the oil line to (can you believe this) reduce oil pressure – otherwise the thing leaked like crazy – even with the restrictor, the rear seal frequently was a leaky mess.  But, reducing the oil pressure was one reason the Ross had marginal lubrication in my opinion. Even then, the oil distribution inside the Ross was also not well designed.

 

Don’t get me wrong, I was glad to get a Ross – because it was the only thing around at the time.  Had old man, Lou Ross, lived longer he may have eventually fixed a lot of these issues, but unfortunately he did not and I won’t go into the situation with his son, Chris.  But, we are fortunate that Tracy took on this challenge and did it right.  

 

One thing I really appreciate about the RWS design is that it has a considerably different internal set up with easily replaceable parts – which was not the case with the Ross.  If you wanted to completely disassembly a Ross unit you most likely had to take it to a machine shop.

 

Just wanted to make it clear that in my opinion the RWS should not be associated with the Ross unit which many have found shortcomings in.

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George Lendich
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 5:20 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 and Ed's EFISM - a great combination

 

 

Steve,

The Ross drive was redeveloped by Tracy Crook of Real World Solutions (RWS). Tracy now uses the 6 planet planetary (Ford Unit) and is about the best you will get  weight wise and value for money.

 

There are other similar units - all have slightly different construction, however Tracy's is well proven. I will probably make my own, but only because of the tyranny of distance and associated costs.

George (down under).

 

Steve,

I went with the RD-1B PSRU from RWS.

 

T Mann



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3267 (20080714) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster