X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from willowsprings.uwyo.edu ([129.72.10.31] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTPS id 3748497 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:06:12 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.72.10.31; envelope-from=SBoese@uwyo.edu Received: from ponyexpress-ht2.uwyo.edu (ponyexpress-ht2.uwyo.edu [10.84.60.209]) by willowsprings.uwyo.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n67M5MZV002233 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:05:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from SBoese@uwyo.edu) Received: from Boesexps (172.26.4.5) by uwmail.uwyo.edu (10.84.60.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.375.2; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:05:21 -0600 From: sboese To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: rotor 2 leading, rotor 2 leading b Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:05:16 -0600 Message-ID: <518DC0132232431684F1698F00C4E8B2@gg.uwyo.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Bill, The engine is normally aspirated. Very little time was spent at more = than 23 inches of manifold pressure with the majority of it at 21 inches or = less. My home field density altitude is almost always 7500 ft or higher. The fuel used was about equal amounts of either 87 octane Mogas or = 100LL. Static timing was set up as in the EC2 manual. Operation was at either max power mixture setting (ROP EGT) for take off = and climb or about 60 degrees LOP EGT for cruise. Do any of the above conditions seem unreasonable? The appearance in the pictures is what I have normally seen at less than = 20 hours of plug operation in the 130 hours the plane has been flying. Steve Boese -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Bradburry Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 3:43 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: rotor 2 leading, rotor 2 leading b Steve, You did that in only 15 hours!? Those plugs look like they were too lean. They are pitted and the = electrode is pitted as well. On the NGK site .Over-advanced ignition timing .Fuel octane rating too low (knock is present) .Excessively lean air-fuel mixture How much boost are you running? Bill B -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of sboese Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 5:05 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Emailing: rotor 2 leading, rotor 2 leading b Ed, Here are two pictures of a plug removed after 15 hours of use, half with 100LL. All the plugs look very similar. Does this plug look typical to = you and satisfy your definition of "no discernable wear"? I'm just trying = to satisfy myself that I'm not seeing something anomolous. Steve Boese -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html