Return-Path: Received: from qmail.accesscomm.ca ([204.83.142.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with SMTP id 2883521 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:54:15 -0500 Received: (qmail 24498 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 16:54:15 -0000 Received: from cust140-67.weyburn-leg.accesscomm.ca (HELO Jarrett) (216.174.140.67) by qmail.accesscomm.ca with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 16:54:15 -0000 Message-ID: <002f01c3be75$12cad680$8200a8c0@Jarrett> From: "JJ JOHNSON" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Air Density at altitude Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:54:12 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002C_01C3BE42.C8070C90" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C3BE42.C8070C90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ed another factor which will help in this situation is the fact that the = air at 25K will be alot colder than at S.L. That will help as well won't = it? I've read somewhere that liquid cooled a/c cool better at altitude = than their aircooled counterparts. Anyone else heard this? Jarrett Johnson ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C3BE42.C8070C90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ed another factor which will help in = this situation=20 is the fact that the air at 25K will be alot colder than at S.L. That = will help=20 as well won't it? I've read somewhere that liquid cooled a/c cool = better=20 at altitude than their aircooled counterparts. Anyone else heard=20 this?

Jarrett = Johnson

------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C3BE42.C8070C90--