Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0) with HTTP id 1848389 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:32:16 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: sanity check - tension bolt issue To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:32:16 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20021030070114.84762.qmail@web20706.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Mr dan ruggirello : I posted earlier (@ flyrotary) that I was skeptical that the tension bolt issue was vibration since my gut feel was the bolt was much stiffer than 110hz (6500 rpm). Well, I just estimated the 1st mode natural frequency and low and behold, I calculated a frequency of 150hz. Too close for comfort!!! Specifics: fixed at one end, pinned at the other diameter: 10mm length: 273mm-10mm ~263mm (10mm thread enguagement) E: 30 msi I: 1.18E-3 in^4 density: .30 lbs/in^3 Yup, very likely it's vibration/fatigue. Now my question is if the RTV or shrink wrap is effective and reliable...... I will probably calculate a fatigue life on the stock bolt, use the RTV and replace the bolts every so often based on fatigue life or go to a higher strength bolt (given it meets the fatigue life) for added margin of safety. (I think I saw a higher strength after market bolt). This seems like a case where the bolts were engineered for an average automobile environment where continuous/frequent high rpms are not a design consideration. I am not that familar with the bolt, anyone know what the stock bolt material is? Is the bolt diameter equal to or less than the minor thread diameter? Dan