Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.85.62] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 2870310 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:28:55 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: K&M and Thick Radiators To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:28:55 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <001901c3bc85$338ff310$0000a398@Carol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "sqpilot@earthlink" : Hi, Ed....I am going to go normally aspirated. Keep it simple approach. I'm hoping to cruise closer to 7 to 8 gallons per hour at cruise at altitude, whatever speed that may give me. My aircraft is pretty clean (low drag), so I should be able to get a decent cruise at those fuel burns? I might just go with a radiator that is 18" x 6" x 4"deep, and settle for a lower rate of climb. My SQ2000 with a Lycoming is supposed to climb at 2500 fpm. (I flew in the factory SQ2000, and we climbed between 2200 and 2400 fpm up to 8000 feet). So, If I have to settle for a lower rate of climb, it should still outclimb any of the Cessnas I have owned. Thanks again for your input, Ed. Paul Conner>