Return-Path: Received: from qmail.accesscomm.ca ([204.83.142.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with SMTP id 2783220 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:27:37 -0500 Received: (qmail 8654 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 14:27:37 -0000 Received: from cust140-67.weyburn-leg.accesscomm.ca (HELO Jarrett) (216.174.140.67) by qmail.accesscomm.ca with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 14:27:37 -0000 Message-ID: <008e01c3ba72$c2b84480$8200a8c0@Jarrett> From: "JJ JOHNSON" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Heaters/defrosters Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:27:34 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Al wrote; I recall a NACA scoop on a Velocity that was somewhere back on the fuselage under the wing for fresh air into the back seat. Opening the vent produced no air coming in. Apparently improperly designed scoop, or bad location; or both. Another problem w/ Naca ducts [ or any ducts into the cockpit] is that if there is no place for the air to get out then the air has no reason to go in the duct. We've run into this problem w/ Lancairs where they cockpit is so sealed up that they didn't get the airflow they expected through the cabin. By enlarging rudder cable openings etc the problem was soon rectified to the point that now they where getting too much air. As long as there is an exit in a lower pressure region [or a exit duct creating a low pressure region] the air WILL come in [usually around the canopy seals and every where else that a person hadn't thought of :-) ] Food for thought Jarrett Johnson