X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3531158 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:44:32 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.92.27; envelope-from=msteitle@gmail.com Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so498879qwh.25 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:43:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iGeXZ2eFoHcdpwWm2e1n9uSFuDLF1M1sgiOjJLtwKUw=; b=IQWS+dogzTTwu/istN6GHkWO8YxYkrGGoDpOt1Azixa+jlEiV8xS2eaA4jzvdLQiRT /bEAEUi9O1VDqA31mZCawQV76cpMdFzHwvUvxI2w62ndqvyVsw6KWLDLdWUBs7FQXnVq j6VXazA5aotZkS1kvw+uQPvKwxMk9jmdXaJAg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gNYZ0JeQuZBfjXdR3Imi/f+0u8Ns2fSggbxHpS0MBs22/ZFd/8Dt9ihJUCDxBuZl4O C5ALRBki6l906HBE9zmyOsA7bfd1nKjnFKMB7KsMprcVfjdtarJriZJjOfnZ45cbKnGp oMKnDjkZ4W4LXbv1mifd5wsLRa45vZ6zyUx1U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.2.74 with SMTP id 10mr4689872qai.259.1236386636209; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:43:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 18:43:56 -0600 Message-ID: <5cf132c0903061643g2a4d0259od92741d8b42463b7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Questions on buying a rotary plane From: Mark Steitle To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd614419d6004647cb2f4 --0015175cd614419d6004647cb2f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dave, That is exactly my point... the certified guys really don't have any choice but to run AVGAS, or risk damaging their mega-buck engines, where we can decide for ourselves which fuel to burn. Mark S. On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:40 PM, David Leonard wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Mike Wills wrote: > >> Dave, >> >> I remember looking at this when you posted about it previously. Not sure >> a race is quite what I had in mind, but better than nothing. I think >> documented performance numbers at typical cruise configurations would be >> more useful. Cant argue with your bang for the buck numbers - one of the >> primary reasons I went rotary as well. I still dont think it's fair to claim >> an economy victory based on the price/use of Mogas because you CHOOSE to >> burn it and your Lyc powered RV buddies CHOOSE not to. >> > > Actually, none of them had any real choice. They were all using the IO-360 > (180 or 200 or even 200++ horse power engines). Running less than 100 > octane, especially at WOT and/or LOP was simply not an option for any of > them. It is also safer for me to run mogas because of my high pressure/high > flow fuel system. Actually it is a non-issue for you and me. No worries > about vapor lock, water contamination, or damage to our ethanol compatible > automotive parts. > > But I know we both still love the rotary after going through all the trials > and tribulations of getting it flying. > > -- > David Leonard > > Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY > http://N4VY.RotaryRoster.net > http://RotaryRoster.net > --0015175cd614419d6004647cb2f4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave,

That is exactly my point... the certified guys really don'= ;t have any choice but to run AVGAS, or risk damaging their mega-buck engin= es, where we can decide for ourselves which fuel to burn.=A0

Mark S= .=A0

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:40 PM, David Leonar= d <wdleonard@gm= ail.com> wrote:


On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:14 PM= , Mike Wills <rv-4mike@cox.net> wrote:
Dave,
=A0
=A0I remember looking at this when you= posted about it previously. Not sure a race is quite what I had in mind, b= ut better than nothing. I think documented performance numbers at typical c= ruise configurations would be more useful.=A0Cant argue with your bang for = the buck numbers - one of the primary reasons I went rotary as well. I stil= l dont think it's fair to claim an economy victory based on the price/u= se of Mogas because you CHOOSE to burn it and your Lyc powered RV buddies C= HOOSE not to.
=A0
Actually, none of them had any real choice.=A0 They were all usi= ng the IO-360 (180 or 200 or even 200++ horse power engines).=A0 Running le= ss than 100 octane, especially at WOT and/or LOP was simply not an option f= or any of them.=A0 It is also safer for me to run mogas because of my high = pressure/high flow fuel system. Actually=A0it is=A0a non-issue for you and = me.=A0 No worries about vapor lock, water contamination, or damage to our e= thanol compatible automotive parts.
=A0
But I know we both still love the rotary after going through all the t= rials and tribulations of getting it flying.

--
David Leonard

Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY
http://N4VY.RotaryRoster.net
http://RotaryRoster.n= et

--0015175cd614419d6004647cb2f4--