Return-Path: Received: from [65.41.23.202] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 2762548 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:34:26 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: More on Need quick help ... To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:34:26 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20031122233648.MBAQ28419.fed1mtao03.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Dale Rogers : Hi All, Well, the urgency has dropped back a little. I looked at the car and they've already been pulling parts from the engine. One coil pair is missing; the wires to the crank angle sensor have been cut, and whatever it plugged into has been removed. I don't know enough to know what else might be missing. I know that - in the long run - things like the stock ignition system won't matter, because I'll be using RWS parts and individual coils. However, I want to start it as a static stand to test some ideas I have, I want an engine that will run with minimal extra purchases. Still looking for information that will help me make a decision on the unit. OBTW, it is an '87 NA, does that mean it's a 6-port? ADVthanksANCE, Dale R. > I know this is a long-shot - because I'll need an answer from whoever is > on-line with the list now - but I just found a place that has three RX-7s - a > pre-'86, an '87 and a post-'89. I can get the 87 engine (complete with ECU, > he says) for $350 USD. I didn't ask a price for the newer unit. > > Is there anything in particular that would make the post-'89 more useful > than the '87?