X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from eastrmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.240.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with ESMTP id 3331311 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:15:32 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.7; envelope-from=taspilot@cox.net Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20081204221457.UCUA3950.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:14:57 -0500 Received: from eastrmwml43 ([172.18.18.217]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id nAEw1a00Q4h0NJL02AEwsT; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:14:56 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=xY3j4B6z203P4gJ+umuYrw==:17 a=HxzbC3-3PNwe21WuKYwA:9 a=jAR9_03zWluBvylreB8A:7 a=HMU_vJ2-ZU9bvITItLrbnzinS-cA:4 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=3A9lNKN2IPAA:10 a=QJAqVYndk0IA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Received: from 72.213.42.202 by webmail.central.cox.net; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:14:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20081204171456.9H6QT.409027.imail@eastrmwml43> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:14:56 -0500 From: To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Fuel system Cc: randy echtinaw In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal Randy Please remove me from your mailing lists. taspilot@cox.net ---- randy echtinaw wrote: Gentlemen, Because a large majority of homebuilt problems are fuel related I am trying to make my system as simple as possible. This is a biplane with a 20 gal. and a 10 gal. tank in front of the inst. panel, RX-8 engine. The only "known" problem I have at the moment is my fuel return. I would like it to return to the main tank only. This would mean burning off 2-3 gallons from the main tank before switching to the 2nd tank. But, this might mean I am setting myself up for a future "pilot error" in fuel management. If I return to both tanks I would need another selector and cockpit control which is making the system more complicated and, again, potential "pilot error." So, suggestions . . . Thank you very much, Randy