X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mta21.charter.net ([216.33.127.81] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with ESMTP id 3330748 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:10:53 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.81; envelope-from=rotary@cmowens.com Received: from aarprv04.charter.net ([10.20.200.74]) by mta21.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20081204171009.FHZO20903.mta21.charter.net@aarprv04.charter.net> for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:10:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (really [24.241.157.64]) by aarprv04.charter.net with ESMTP id <20081204171009.JDZY7551.aarprv04.charter.net@[192.168.0.100]> for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:10:09 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7CAC62C1-6838-477E-A1FB-B681DAFE979D@cmowens.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christopher Owens Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Exhaust system choices Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:10:08 -0600 To: Rotary motors in aircraft X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Chzlrs: 0 Did some more searching and it looks like this topic was well covered back in June. I'll take a close look at the topic and see what there is to see. Otherwise, happy to read any other thoughts on the topic. Best regards, Chris On Dec 4, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Christopher Owens wrote: > Hi all, > > Been lurking in this group for a while and thought it might be time > for a question of my own. > > I've read through Tracy's exhaust adventures on his web site, in > his conversion guide, and in his Mazda Papers, and note that he's > tried just about every imaginable combination that would fit in his > aircraft. It seems that the underbody mounted solution is the one > that's seen the most use. And it probably works best given the > limited space inside the cowl of his aircraft. > > But what if one is building an aircraft that has more space inside > the engine compartment? My friend and I will begin construction of > a pair of Barrows Bearhawk aircraft in pretty short order, and > rotary engines are likely in their future. There's a fair amount > of space inside the cowling of this aircraft after the engine goes > in, the best that I can tell. If space permits, is the tangential > muffler the better option for this installation? I've also > considered seeing if I could use the Racing Beat header and snake > some curved tubing around to meet some exhaust components inside > the engine compartment as well, but don't know if this is an > effective solution too many turns in the system for clean exhaust > output. I'm still doing much research in this regard. > > Elden Yates just finished his rotary Bearhawk and is flying off > hours, as I understand it, but I haven't seen many photos of his > engine installation to see what fits and what doesn't. Perhaps > I'll be lucky enough to see it at Oshkosh one day. > > Thanks and best regards, > Chris (digging through the archives for hints) > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/ > flyrotary/List.html