That’s just about what I see and I
measure at the same place, Jeff.
But, Bobby is measuring on the other
end of the loop before the oil cooler and oil filter. So there is going
to be higher pressure ahead of those two components and lower pressure
after. Just how much, I really don’t have a clue and it may not be
a significant drop. But, Bobby indicated he may change the sensor
location in which case, we could have a hard data point on the pressure drop
between the two locations.
BUT, if you do develop impediment to flow
due to a partially clogged filter or oil cooler, a pressure sensor place before
those components will tend to register a higher pressure whereas the actual pressure
at the other end near the bearings may be considerably lower. Seeing
higher oil pressure before those components may (or may not) be significant,
but seeing lower pressure after those components could lead to damaged
bearings.
So the point is to put the sensor on the
bearing end of the loop (as you and I and Most? Have done) so that you will
know what the pressure is doing there. The oil filter and oil cooler
really don’t care much about what the pressure is (assuming its somewhere
near reasonable), but you engine bearings do care.
Of course, if you never have a plugged
filter or oil cooler then it really doesn’t matter which end the sensor
is located on. I never have encounter either of those situations, but I
still want to know the pressure on the bearing end {:>).
Ed
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Jeff Whaley
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008
11:06 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil
Pressure measuring point
I’ve been
reading the exchanges between Ed, Bobby and now Tracy.
Presently my system
measures both oil temperature and oil pressure in the line between engine (high
on rear iron, near filter) and PSRU. I don’t see what Bobby reports;,
rather I see 70 psi when cold no matter what rpm. As oil temperature rises I
see steps in oil pressure rpm-dependent.
If I understand
correctly, to see the steady-state 70-80 psi oil return, I would have to tap
into the one-piece 5/8” braided hose running from my oil cooler to back
to the front cover?
Jeff
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008
8:13 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Oil Pressure
was RE: [FlyRotary] Re: New Engine Break In with Gearbox -- for Tracy
Hi Bobby,
Ok, if I understand your set up correctly,
you are measuring oil pressure BEFORE the oil filter or the oil cooler –
right out of the engine? If that is correct continue to read – if I
misunderstood then this may not be applicable.
Your oil pressure sensor location may
account for what you are seeing. Most oil pressure references are
measured as the oil pressure goes back into the engine. You appear to be
measuring it at the opposite end of the lubrication system compared to where
most measure it.
The reason for choosing the oil
inlet to the engine point for pressure measurement is that point is where
lubrication system is providing pressure for the main bearings – so an
important reason the pressure is of most interest at that point. It really
doesn’t matter (not quite true – you do need the pump to be
producing pressure) what your oil pressure is on the output end of the
pump – if the oil pressure is not sufficient on the end where it
flows back into the engine - where the lubrication system feeds the
bearings – then you could fry your bearings.
An example – lets say your pump is
good, but your oil filter or oil cooler becomes partially blocked impeding flow
severely. If you are measuring pressure before those points you would
likely see your oil pressure increasing (due to the blocked flow) – which
could give you a false sense of security – because your bearings could be
starving for oil due to the blocked flow.
But, if your pressure sensor is not on the
inflow end of the lubrication system – you would have no direct
indication that your oil pressure has drop dangerously low. The higher
reading you would be getting from the other end would probably convince you
that all is OK. At least that is a scenario that I believe is possible.
So, In the traditional set up that
means that you have pressure drops (Losses) through your oil filter and your
oil cooler and the normal oil pressure after that (assuming a stock oil
pressure regulator) is around 70-80 psi above 4500-5000 rpm (or in that
vicinity).
The oil pump end has a pressure controller that is supposed to pop and
release pressure if it senses pressure above 150 psi. That is NOT the
controller that regulates pressure for the system – only a safety release
say should your oil line becomes blocked (of course your bearings
wouldn’t live very long if that happened). The oil pressure regulator (normally set for a max of 80 psi
in a stock engine) is on the other end of the lubrication system at the point
the oil goes back into the engine. The point that provides oil to the
bearings – so perhaps not surprising that the regulator is located there.
The pressure
is suppose to be maintained steady by the oil pressure regulator– so no
matter what volume(flow) of oil (based on rpm) is going through the system the
pressure is held steady by the oil pressure regulator on the inflow end.
So I suspect that because your oil
pressure sensor appears to be on the pump end of the system and not on
the end where the pressure regulator is located that you are seeing
perturbations to oil pressure (and because you don’t have the oil filter
and cooler drops) and higher oil pressure than most of us do.
Now the pressure drops through the oil
filter and oil cooler may not be linear with flow rate (which would dependent
on oil pump/engine rpm ) or temperature (viscosity) of the oil.
I suspect that the cooler the oil is, the
more resistance it finds in flowing through the oil filter and oil
cooler. Therefore you would see more pressure on the pump end due to this
resistance, but as the oil warmed up and flow through the filter and cooler
easier then the pressure build up before those components would drop as would
your oil pressure.
Because of your oil pressure sensor
location and the factors I mentioned above, I would expect you to see higher
oil pressure and a wider range to the perturbations to your oil pressure based
on temps than most of us see.
Since you are not using the stock Rx-7 oil
cooler, then my comments about the effect of the thermostat on oil pressure may
not be applicable.
At least, this is the way it appears to
me. Others may have a different view point
Ed
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Bobby J. Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008
9:21 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New
Engine Break In with Gearbox -- for Tracy
Tracy,
With the Advanced EFIS / engine monitor
all of the instruments are factory calibrated and so far have been correct. Oil
pressure is being read directly out of the engine before the oil filter and oil
/ water exchanger. I made a quick run to the airport this afternoon and made
another 15 minute ground with the inlet ducts blocked. I was able to get the
water up to 200F and climbing and oil to 165F. OAT was 75F Oil pressure varied
from 65 at idle to 105 psi at 6000 rpm. On earlier ground runs to 7500 rpm I
was only able to get the oil to 144F and water to 177F. OAT was 65F or less.
and oil pressure in the 110-120 range. Warming the oil up did seem to make
a difference.
Ed,
"Bobby, depending of where your oil pressure sensor is located
(before or after the oil cooler – assuming a stock Rx-7 oil cooler with
internal thermostat). IF you have removed the thermostat in the oil
cooler and have not blocked that thermostat opening, then a lot of the oil will
not flow through the several passages through the cooler core. This could
mean you are not getting the normal pressure drop across the oil cooler which
if your sensor is down stream would mean higher pressure at the sensor –
but probably not more than 5 – 10 psi."
No thermostat in the oil or water
circuits. If the sensor placement is making a 10 psi difference then the
problem may not exist. My remote oil filter adapter has two inlets and two
outlets. I am using the second inlet for oil pressure and the second outlet
will be used to monitor the before oil cooler temp with the EM3. No room at the
engine oil pad adapter block for the pressure sender so this location was easy.
It's visible in one of the photos.
Bobby
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Tracy Crook
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008
11:31 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New
Engine Break In with Gearbox -- for Tracy
Odd problems. Peak
Oil pressure should not be significantly affected by temperature or oil
weight. What is it? Lower viscosity oil is not a
solution. Are you sure the instruments are right / calibrated?
Tracy
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bobby J. Hughes <bhughes@qnsi.net> wrote:
I am having a problem getting my oil temps
up and oil pressure down without an oil thermostat. Will try blocking some
of the air flow this weekend. Is 10W-40 or 10W-30 to light for the
gearbox during the winter months? I plan to run the engine for at least
20 hours on the ground and switch back to Mobil 1 for first flight.
Bobby
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of Tracy Crook
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008
9:12 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Engine
Break In with Gearbox -- for Tracy
Next best in mineral oil
is Shell Rotella. 15W - 50 or similar.
Tracy
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Bobby J. Hughes <bhughes@qnsi.net> wrote:
What oil do you recommend for breaking in a new engine that
is also acceptable for the
gearbox? Bruce T said to replace the Mobile 1
for 10-15 hours so the apex seals will seat.
Bobby J Hughes
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3267 (20080714) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3267 (20080714) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com