X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from neon.toast.net ([65.203.23.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with ESMTP id 3329682 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:15:09 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.203.23.149; envelope-from=rjechtinaw@toast.net Received: from dialup-4.225.243.61.Dial1.Detroit1.Level3.net (unverified [4.225.243.61]) by neon.toast.net (Vircom SMTPRS 4.6.741.1) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:14:23 -0500 X-Modus-BlackList: 4.225.243.61=OK;rjechtinaw@toast.net=OK X-Modus-Trusted: 4.225.243.61=NO X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 Message-Id: <166B8854-F068-4926-9BD0-D0ECCF63BBFE@toast.net> From: randy echtinaw To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel system Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:14:03 -0500 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) I thought it sounded to easy. Guess I will be running returns to both tanks Randy ----------------- On Dec 3, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Tracy Crook wrote: > Too good and dangerous too. You would be amazed how fast the 10 > gallon tank would fill up. There is usually more fuel going to the > return line than to the engine. The result would be a fuel > management nightmare. > > Tracy > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:45 PM, randy echtinaw > wrote: > What if I returned all the fuel to the smaller non inverted tank and > burned from that one first. When empty I could switch to the main 20 > gallon tank with the return still going to the smaller tank. If > needed I could always return to the smaller tank for the returned > fuel from the main. Does this sound to easy to be true? > Thanks, > Randy > ----------------------- > > On Dec 3, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Al Gietzen wrote: > > > Charlies' suggestion of the Facet transfer pump is what I've been > using. I use a 'T' in the fuel return line to the main tank for the > transfer pump so it didn't even require an additional fitting in the > tank (above what is necessary for EFI). The Facet has a check valve > function internally. > There really is not a simpler system that I am aware of. > > Well; there is, but of course it is dependant on air frame design. > My Velocity has gravity feed from both mains to a 3 gallon sump, > gravity feed from sump to the EFI pump; regulator return to the > sump. Now that's simple. > > Al G > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >