FONT NUT
CAUTION
Jeff, as Tracy mentioned – delay changing
the main pulley until a bit later (unless its clear there is a defect in it)
because if you DO let the thrust bearing slip off its shoulder on the E shaft –
it’s a minimum of taking the front cover off the engine (next to
firewall) to get to it. In most cases, due to limited space under the cowl and
motor mounts, you end up taking the engine off the aircraft. That’s not
fun any time and I imagine even less so with temps in the 30F range.
BUT, if you decide you HAVE to replace the
main pulley without removing the engine, here is a suggestion.
Raise the tail of your aircraft as high in
the air as you safely can. This will tend to keep the thrust bearing toward
the rear of the engine (front of aircraft) where it rests against a spacer.
That way the shock of an impact wrench will not have as much tendency to “walk”
the bearing forward and off its shoulder. No guarantee it won’t get out
of position – just a bit less likely - than if the nose is up.
There are some instructions in the Mazda
manual or somewhere that tells you how to determine if the thrust bearing has
falling out of position by taking some measurements based on how far you can
get the pulley nut back on the shaft – but, I can’t recall at
the moment where they and you really don’t want to go there at this time
in any case.
THERMOSTAT
I believe I read about the loss of
efficiency by leaving out the plug in one of Racing Beat’s old technical
catalogs and I am fairly certain they mentioned 20%. Well, I looked in one of
their old catalogs and while I did not find a specific percentage mentioned (at
least in my quick search), this is a quote from them:
Quote :
“
7. Mazda’s water thermostat is a “by-pass” type (apparently referring to the ˝” by-pass hole). Therefore, if it is removed for racing, the hole below it MUST be plugged……
…
NOTE: The thermostat should be removed and the bypass plugged for racing. Do not use restrictors in the system.
Free Flow is best.
“
RADIATOR INTAKE HOSE
Another thing Racing Beat cautions about -
is making certain that the radiator hose on the suction side is the type that
has a spring coiled in side or is otherwise stiff enough to resist collapsing
under the suction of the water pump. If that happens, of courses, your coolant
flowed is seriously impeded.
The hose may be able to resist the suction
at idle or low rpm, but may not at the higher rpm. If you squeeze the hose and
can deform it with your hand pressure , then it is likely too flimsy to serve
as the radiator hose on the intake side of the pump.
You are 99% there, Jeff. So no rash
action, just take it one step at a time {:>) – easy for me to say.
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Tracy Crook
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008
10:41 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Hot first
flight
Impact wrench if you have
the room, breaker bar and muscle if not. Be VERY careful not to let
the thrust bearing fall out of place when replacing the pulley. (as me
how I know :>) Actually, my advice would be to leave it alone until
you get everything worked out. You really aren't reving the engine so
high as to make the ratio change mandatory. You mentioned that there was
no difference. Something is fishy there. Don't let it grow old and
stink.
Tracy Crook
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Jeff Whaley <jwhaley@datacast.com> wrote:
Thanks Lynn
for the technical info; I had not seen been to that website before …
Racing Beat I am well aware of. Actually I bought one of their double
alternator pulleys, which they claim reduces rpm by 20% … other than
aluminum instead of steel it is same diameter of existing pulley. I'd like to
change it anyway for the small weight gain and what-if due to belt breakage
… but I can't get the nut off … any hints?
Jeff
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of Lynn Hanover
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008
9:46 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Hot first
flight
Thanks to you all for the congratulatory comments …
attached is a picture of expansion tank and preflight roll-out … the
orange line is fuel return; the brass is pressure gauge pickup and snifter
valve installation.
After reading Eds' email I now know why the water
temperature was so high. I installed a thermostat with the onset of cold
weather, but I couldn't use the original Mazda thermostat because my
temperature bulb protrudes across the bypass hole. Originally the bypass
hole was plugged and there was no thermostat; however, I removed the bypass
plug and used a non-Mazda thermostat !! … so that's why the underside of
the Mazda thermostat is so long! Thanks Ed for setting me straight and based on
your comment about 20% loss of efficiency, I could possibly see 230F x 0.8 or
as low as 184F on next flight … that would be great! For now the
thermostat is gone and bypass is re-plugged.
Closer examination of the belt and rubber deposits on
underside of top cowling suggests the belt got jammed in the pulley and cut by
friction.
I tried again last night to remove the alternator pulley
nut … what's the secret? Left-hand thread? Loctite or what? It's so tight
I'm afraid of damaging something trying to get it off.
Jeff
Belt failures are in modern times, a very rare
occurrence. Dual or multiple belt installations are generally found where a
single belt would be operating at close to maximum capability and so are
servicing the same pulleys. Multiple belts servicing some different pulleys are
not in this class.
For same pulley installations multiple belts need to be
matched sets. The Government uses thousands of sets of matched belts for large
diesel trucks. Some with 3 or 4 belts each.This is not a redundant system
designed for reliability. In any case where a belt is run to death, or rock
damaged, the remaining belt(s) will often fail in the same instant by ingesting
pieces of the failing belt, it that is not the case, the remaining belt(s) will
fail just from operating close to their load limit. In every case,
one must assume that the companion belt has suffered some damage, and it wont
match the length of any single belt installed along side it, so it (they)
remaining belts should be discarded.
If there is not an obvious FOD cause for the failure, the
installation should be checked carefully for alignment, tension and
stiffness (rigidity) at high RPM. Also with accessories loaded and unloaded.
The crank nose on the rotary is a weak point, and can
fail right at the front main bearing if the belts are over tensioned. Note the
mass of pulleys found on some years of the cars. The single or double pulley in
small diameter mounted close to the front cover, is less prone to failure just
from the lever arm difference. On assembly it is common to torque the pulley
bolt to 95 foot pounds as this stiffens the stack of items clamped in place by
the bolt. You must then check crank end play at the same torque, as some end
play is used up when this is done. There is a belt length that fits between the
water pump and crank pulley with the race pulley set, that fits perfectly with
no idler. I discarded the first such belt after three years, although there was
no sign of wear at all, other than the writing was gone.
Also: From Mazda Competition,