X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.8) with ESMTP id 3199702 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:13:01 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.42; envelope-from=alventures@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20081004221224.XXPB6526.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:12:24 -0400 Received: from BigAl ([72.192.137.74]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id NmCQ1a00A1cVYgg04mCQwF; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:12:24 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=XOAs6yDEjD4A:10 a=IuhOeO9pvC4UhuZ1xmkA:9 a=H3BZml9emprgNORY6MPDuqAPPOoA:4 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=gi0PWCVxevcA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EM/EC2 vs. EM/EC3 Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:13:29 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 In-Reply-To: I don't know about the differences for a 2-rotor; but for a 3-rotor, based I what I know of the changes, I'd say it is significant. Definitely go for the EC3. Al G -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bob White Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 3:52 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EM/EC2 vs. EM/EC3 Hi Brian, I don't know the details of the functionality, but the main difference is the EC3 uses a 25 pin connector and a 15 pin connector instead of one 37 pin connector. There is also an oxygen sensor input and a knock sensor input that is not present on the EC2. I don't know how they are used. Bob W. tml