X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost05.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.105] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.8) with ESMTP id 3198842 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:00:39 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.105; envelope-from=bryanwinberry@bellsouth.net Received: from study (adsl-211-16-191.asm.bellsouth.net[68.211.16.191]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc05) with SMTP id <20081004020002H0500e9dive>; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 02:00:02 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.211.16.191] From: "Bryan Winberry" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EM/EC2 vs. EM/EC3 Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 22:00:04 -0400 Message-ID: <5426E58225EF473083D7F9CFEF50EF9A@study> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0048_01C925A3.64917100" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6838 Thread-Index: AcklwD8jd+5pSWDURu+ml+IVp2XqHgABFHKw Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C925A3.64917100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks (Bob and Ed) for your reply. I read the RWS website, but I don't have a real good working knowledge of these components so I appreciate = the layman's translation. BW =20 -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 9:26 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EM/EC2 vs. EM/EC3 =20 Bryan, unless you are getting a great deal on an EC2, then I would = strongly suggest that you go with the EC3. Not only does it have some additional features, but Tracy has told me they intend to stop producing the old = EC2. They will still support it, but all new productions will be the EC3. = Also as Bob mentioned, I think not having one 37 pin connector but two = smaller connectors is an installation advantage myself. =20 Either one will do fine on a Renesis but might as well go with the = future. =20 FWIW =20 Ed =20 Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com http://www.andersonee.com http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html _____ =20 From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bryan Winberry Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 6:27 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] EM/EC2 vs. EM/EC3 =20 I'm putting a renesis in my RV7 and have a decision to make regarding = these products. Could some of you with more familiarity, give me some advice as to the advantages of the 2's vs. the new 3 series? Thanks, Bryan Winberry =20 __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus = signature database 3267 (20080714) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus = signature database 3267 (20080714) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C925A3.64917100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks (Bob and Ed) for your = reply. I read the RWS website, but I don’t have a real good working = knowledge of these components so I appreciate the layman’s = translation.

BW

-----Original = Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Friday, October 03, = 2008 9:26 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = EM/EC2 vs. EM/EC3

Bryan, unless = you are getting a great deal on an EC2, then I would strongly suggest that you = go with the EC3. Not only does it have some additional features, but Tracy = has told me they intend to stop producing the old EC2. They will still = support it, but all new productions will be the EC3. Also as Bob = mentioned, I think not having one 37 pin connector but two smaller connectors is an installation advantage myself.

Either one will = do fine on a Renesis but might as well go with the future.

FWIW

Ed<= /p>

Ed = Anderson

Rv-6A N494BW = Rotary Powered

Matthews, = NC

eanderson@carolin= a.rr.com

http://www.andersonee.com

http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW

http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html<= /p>

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bryan Winberry
Sent: Friday, October 03, = 2008 6:27 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] = EM/EC2 vs. EM/EC3

I’m putting a renesis = in my RV7 and have a decision to make regarding these = products.

Could some of you with more familiarity, give me some advice as to the advantages of the 2’s = vs. the new 3 series?

Thanks,

Bryan Winberry =

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus = signature database 3267 (20080714) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus = signature database 3267 (20080714) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C925A3.64917100--