X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.8) with ESMTP id 3133885 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:40:54 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.39; envelope-from=alventures@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080916054017.OLTD29505.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:40:17 -0400 Received: from BigAl ([72.192.137.74]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id FHgJ1a0021cVYgg04HgJoA; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:40:18 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=FTwr1IM_GtALBKo8FicA:9 a=2wV9HS_d1hKTamYJE7Cfsc9UkxkA:4 a=BfMIweohVSgA:10 a=3ZoQVui2EUaKG-3i7SEA:9 a=-SnTXnAC4Fv2Wle46bEA:7 a=6ycJawdKzW1plOwpDktaF-6-2UIA:4 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 setup Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:40:42 -0800 Message-ID: <286E729A3D1E46F491794FABD592DDD3@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01C91784.161B4E60" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C91784.161B4E60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So clarify what "it worked fine" means? Does that mean that the engine = runs more or less the same on A & B after the copy? Or does that simply mean = that you know the data copied OK? Mike;=20 Tune A; copy to B - if the copy is successful it should then run the = same on B as A. The only difference (TIAAO) is A has induction air temp input = and B doesn't. It is a second order effect, and if running at about the same = OAT there should be no difference. If it is copying successfully, then it seems it is at least remotely possible that there is something amiss with the inlet air temp sensor causing the tuning of A to be biased. You can measure its resistance, = and unless, again, something is different than on my controller; it should = be about 10K Ohms. Al ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C91784.161B4E60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=

 So clarify what "it worked = fine" means? Does that mean that the engine runs more or less the = same on A & B after the copy? Or does that simply mean that you know the data copied = OK?

Mike;

Tune A; copy to B – if the copy is successful it should then run the same on B as A.  The only difference (TIAAO) is A has = induction air temp input and B doesn’t. It is a second order effect, and if = running at about the same OAT there should be no difference.

If it is copying successfully, then it = seems it is at least remotely possible that there is something amiss with the = inlet air temp sensor causing the tuning of A to be biased. You can measure its = resistance, and unless, again, something is different than on my controller; it = should be about 10K Ohms.

Al

------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C91784.161B4E60--