X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTP id 3077479 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:27:59 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.44; envelope-from=rv-4mike@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080815032717.ODRG6684.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:27:17 -0400 Received: from wills ([68.105.85.56]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 2TTG1a00Q1CvZmk03TTJTc; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:27:18 -0400 Message-ID: <006101c8fe86$d20d7830$38556944@wills> From: "Mike Wills" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: MoGas Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:27:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005E_01C8FE4C.256980E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C8FE4C.256980E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I used Permatex #2 on my fuel senders and they've been leak free going = on a year now. Mike Wills RV-4 N144MW ----- Original Message -----=20 From: hoursaway1@comcast.net=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 5:56 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: MoGas I'm not Charlie either, but my brother-in-law Dave in Standish MI now = receives a Gov. check because he agreed to commit some of his corn for = ethanol use from his dairy farm, how is this helping????? David Cook = RV6A Rotary ( WARNING!!!!!!! DO NOT USE TIGHT-SEAL FROM AIRCRAFT = SPRUCE FOR SENDER COVERS ON FUEL TANKS, MOGAS WILL DISSOLVE & LEAK ) = Re-sealing both tanks now, any suggestions as to what gskt. sealer (not = permanent) to use? -------------- Original message --------------=20 From: "Al Gietzen" =20 > I'm not Charlie but in my opinion, corn is one of the worst due to = > competition w/ food consumers.=20 > -------------=20 >=20 > I'm not Charlie either, but in my opinion corn is the worst = because it is a=20 > no-gainer - meaning it takes as much energy (+- depending on data = source) to=20 > produce the corn and make the ethanol as you get back from the = ethanol. And=20 > burning ethanol still puts CO2 into the atmosphere. If it weren't = for the=20 > heavy lobbying (read campaign contributions and other perks for = politicians)=20 > by the major grain companies (ADM, Cargil, etc.) over the past = decade or=20 > more; who are now making big bucks producing the stuff from corn = with=20 > government subsidies - there would not be a corn/ethanol program = in this=20 > country.=20 >=20 > Making ethanol from sugar cane, as they do in Brazil, makes some = sense.=20 > They are achieving energy out/energy in of greater than 8 : 1 in = the newer=20 > plants.=20 >=20 > Al G=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 > Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C8FE4C.256980E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I used Permatex #2 on my fuel = senders and=20 they've been leak free going on a year now.
 
Mike Wills
RV-4 N144MW
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 hoursaway1@comcast.net =
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 = 5:56=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = MoGas

I'm not Charlie either, but my brother-in-law Dave in Standish MI = now=20 receives a Gov. check because he agreed to commit some of his corn for = ethanol=20 use from his dairy farm, how is this helping????? David Cook  = RV6A=20 Rotary  ( WARNING!!!!!!!  DO NOT USE TIGHT-SEAL FROM = AIRCRAFT SPRUCE=20 FOR SENDER COVERS ON FUEL TANKS, MOGAS WILL DISSOLVE & LEAK = ) =20 Re-sealing both tanks now, any suggestions as to what gskt. sealer = (not=20 permanent) to use?
 
--------------=20 Original message --------------
From: "Al Gietzen"=20 <ALVentures@cox.net>

> I'm not Charlie but in my = opinion,=20 corn is one of the worst due to
> competition w/ food = consumers.=20
> -------------
>
> I'm not Charlie either, but = in my=20 opinion corn is the worst because it is a
> no-gainer - = meaning it=20 takes as much energy (+- depending on data source) to
> = produce the=20 corn and make the ethanol as you get back from the ethanol. And =
>=20 burning ethanol still puts CO2 into the atmosphere. If it weren't = for the=20
> heavy lobbying (read campaign contributions and other perks = for=20 politicians)
> by the major grain companies (ADM, Cargil, = etc.) over=20 the past decade or
> more; who are now making big bucks = producing the=20 stuff from corn with
> government subsidies - there would not = be a=20 corn/ethanol program in this
> country.
>
> = Making=20 ethanol from sugar cane, as they do in Brazil, makes some sense. =
>=20 They are achieving energy out/energy in of greater than 8 : 1 in the = newer=20
> plants.
>
> Al G
>
>
> =
>=20 --
> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and = UnSub:=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20
------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C8FE4C.256980E0--